Looking at France’s cities: Bordeaux

Montpellier, July 22, 2018

 

From Arcachon, I took the train into Bordeaux.

After the importance and elegance of Paris, and the evident, nearly uniform affluence of Arcachon and Pyla, I was initially taken aback.   Of course, Bordeaux is much smaller than Paris, but much of it is also run down.  My first walk, from the St. Jean train station, was through a busy area of very old, two story houses, generally in elegant limestone, but not in good shape.  Everything looked low rise and small.  Even at the center of the city, the buildings have no more than 4-5 stories, and in many other areas, there are houses, shops and streets that are too neglected to be charming.  The vaunted St. Catherine Street consists largely seedy and generic shops, drawing tourists and poor immigrants.

 

Place de la Victoire

 

This is not what was emphasized in the reading before my arrival.  Queen Elizabeth herself described Bordeaux as elegant.  The historic city has been largely redone.  Its classical buildings are among the finest in Europe, and its historic district, which appears to include the entire center city, is a UNESCO world heritage site, the second largest in France (after Paris).  Its history and wealth are fortunately tied to the wine trade–Bordeaux vineyards are north, south and east of it—and unfortunately to the slave trade, although in the latter it is not unique. For some hundreds of years, Bordeaux was an English possession, although the English rulers at that time spoke in French.  The trade in “claret” has strong links to England, as shipping wine by boat to England and Holland (where it was made into spirits) was easier than shipping it overland in France.  More than in the rest of France, I was told, the bordelais like clairet (between a red wine and a rose) and tea.

 

But the city has a cultural importance that held my expectations, and it improved vastly with the visit.  Indeed, within a few days I had found and was converted to its incredible beauty, both where it has and has not been fixed up, now fully convinced that a highly-evolved urbanity can exist in a city that is both relatively small and affordable.

 

Le Grand Theatre

 

Bordeaux is a city of endless, classical, limestone facades, gracing the housing of both the rich and the poor, the native-born and the immigrant, and providing a varied yet consistent backdrop to government buildings, the public garden, traffic circles and irregular church “squares”.  None of it has been over-renovated—it all looks and feels old.  The buildings, dating from the 17th, 18th and even 19th century, are mostly contextual, that is modest, with occasional flourishes, all in limestone, respectful in scale.

 

 

The city is busy with traffic, much of it from small cars, visible everywhere except in the large pedestrian area at the city’s center, yet unlike well-preserved Boston, it not overwhelmed by its considerable traffic—most of the streets are simply too narrow.  The whole thing is tied together by a bus network, which I never figured out, and by a modern, futurist, tram system, that floats slowly on the streets, tracks embedded in the stone and cobblestones that it shares with cars, and even with pedestrians on the main central square that faces the Grand Theatre.

 

The buildings, even the largest and grandest, are intimate, no more than 5 or 6 stories.  Many are one-family houses.  Cafe’s, bakeries, grocers, and luxurious stores such as JM Weston (the shoemaker), Figaret (the shirtmaker) and iconic Hermes (which epitomizes luxury by selling nothing that is absolutely needed), are all graced with classical facades.  Even the 50-meter public swimming pool on the rue Judaique, which dates from the 1930’s, with a modern glass curtain wall, sundeck, and 1970’s concrete dressing rooms, is set behind an 18th century limestone gate, perhaps the former entrance to a park or an aristocratic residence, known in France, as an høtel.   (Sorry, I cannot get my mac to type the circumflex).

 

Does it lack individuality?  Perhaps, if you are an architect or developer seeking creativity, or a land owner who would prefer to speculate on land acquisition to maximize profit.  All of these buildings are protected, and changes are supervised by the French administration.  But if you are walking in it, shopping in it, rushing home in it, sitting in a café or on a bench, or watching people in the street, it feels immensely urbane and human.  I have not yet found out where Bordeaux houses its high tech or aeronautics facilities, perhaps outside of the city center (a later topic), but I saw discreet signs for law offices and banks, and less discreet windows for neighborhood real estate agencies, restaurants, confectioners and pastry shops (so many of them), grocers and cafes everywhere.  The center remains active, much more than a tourist destination, although there were many of us, filled with people going about their business.  This is not at all how I remember the centers of Lyons or Toulouse, and that is not my first impression of Montpellier, but that will be checked on my visits to those cities.

 

In much wealthier New York, we house the poor in 19th century brick walk-ups, with some limestone trim (Why we preserve these, I have no idea.) or in faceless brick high rises, which also house the rich and the middle class. Glass elegance we have, but limestone is mostly limited to the first two floors, even on very good Manhattan buildings.  (There are of course a few exceptions such as 740 Park or 19 East 72nd Street.)  When a highrise condominium, 15 Central Park West, was built and clad in limestone, its use was a social and architectural tool, and a marketing statement that attracted significant press attention.

 

So in Bordeaux, a much poorer place than New York, I walked a huge UNESCO heritage site and a city of seemingly endless, modest, luxury.  To what can I compare this in the United States? And I do not mean the age, rather the feel.  To a significant degree, we mistreat our older cities, either overbuilding and overpricing them to ruin, or destroying them through neglect.  Privileged Americans, we travel here to admire what we refuse to preserve or create at home.

 

behind the basilique St. Seurin

 

I had a wonderful afternoon in the center of old Bordeaux:  a  meeting at the Grand Hotel, facing the Grand Theatre, chocolates in an elaborately old-fashioned shop around the corner, coffee at the attractive and hip Alchemist, food shopping at the round and covered marketplace Grands Hommes, and tea, from Mariage Freres (founded in 1854).  Then peeks into a couple of hotel lobbies that were a lot nicer than mine—to one of which I eventually moved.  And of course, a renaissance church and a lot of cleaned up, beautifully maintained, limestone buildings.  Then a swim in that Olympic-sized pool on the rue Judaique, and a long pleasant walk past crowded trams, to my hotel, interrupted by a brief unplanned stop into an organ recital at the Cathedrale St. Andre.   And then a nap and bread and cheese and fruit from the nearby Capucins market.

 

On another afternoon, I strolled through old residential neighborhoods in Saint Michel, Saint Paul and Saint Pierre, where tightly woven streets alternate with open squares and some wider avenues.  The buildings, still limestone, are alternately tired and redone.  The population looks settled and local, immigrants and young, somewhat multiracial, North African and French, a comfortable place for me.  I found a classic, charming bistro facing the St. Michel basilica, and returned that evening for a classic, although mediocre, meal.

 

restaurant in the St. Michel district

 

Have I mentioned the wine culture in Bordeaux?  I had only a small taste of it, but as a northern Californian, and former San Francisco resident, I could not help reacting to the similarities and to the differences.  San Francisco is to Napa and Sonoma as Bordeaux is to, well Bordeaux wines.  San Francisco is a stunningly beautiful city, and it has the considerable advantage of extraordinary geography, but it has the considerable disadvantage of being hugely expensive.  Bordeaux offers the refinements of its classical design and its history, in a less dramatic geographical setting, and its ancient wine culture struck me, ironically given its US reputation, as more affordable and accessible. I took a very good, short wine tasting class at the striking new wine museum, the Cite des Vins.  The teacher’s detailed knowledge was impressive and without any of the ordinary and usual references to the important celebrities who consume or made them. It was just about the wine.  Then I visited a second museum in the Chatrons district, which examines the history of the wine trade.  And on my last evening, a visit to the Bar a Vin, a wine café, in an eclectically redesigned classical interior.  Operated by the Bordeaux Wine Council, and crowded in the evenings, I waited my turn to try interesting, if not the very best wines, at 3 or 4 euros a glass (with cheese or charcuterie).

 

Bar a Vin, behind the bar

 

Bar a Vin

 

On an earlier morning, I returned to the Capucins market for a coffee, and entered into a long conversation, with a friendly, chic, Parisian woman, who followed a man to Bordeaux four years ago.  The man did not work out, she said, but she has kept her small rental house, with two bedrooms, a bathroom, and a small potager, or vegetable garden.  The house is large enough for her work studio, where she restores and resells mid-century furniture.  Her income is a bit less than it was in Paris, but her expenses much less. The native bordelais are not terribly friendly she told me, so her friends are others who have moved in, also from Paris.  I was made to understand, by her and others, that Bordeaux is conservative, and not terribly open to outsiders and immigrants.  But with a couple of exceptions, I found everyone to be friendly and helpful, despite my accent and occasional word trouble.

 

 

 

 

Posted in Commentary, Uncategorized | 5 Comments

Returning to France and why it matters

A dining room at Pyla-sur-mer, France. courtesy Francois Duclert

Bordeaux, July 21, 2018 

My trip began sixty years ago, in a very different generation and place, when my mother found me a French tutor in Los Gatos, the northern California town where I grew up.    (I don’t know  why she did this, but in 1960’s America, French was still considered the language of high culture, and perhaps she had already divined my slim chances as an athlete.)

Mlle. Simenon was from Lille, a sweet older woman, and she taught me a few songs and a few words, in brief sessions at the table of her dark, curtain-drawn, 19th century Victorian apartment.  Then there was Mme. Small, at the Singapore American School in the late 1960’s, who mimicked a monkey to teach us the correct pronunciation of the difficult letter “u” and later, Mr. Keplinger, another fabulous and serious teacher at the Los Gatos High School.  (Some years later, at a party in Marin County, I told a woman that she reminded me of my former teacher. “I am Mme. Small”, she replied.  In writing this, I am thanking her again for everything. . . )

The big launch was at age 19, my sophomore year in college (1972-73?), when I took/audited courses at the famous Institut d’Etudes Politiques in Paris and lived with a family in their large apartment in the Auteuil section of the 16th arrondissement.  That family, the Marions, (and very especially Francois and Claude) became very good friends, as did their neighbors downstairs, the Duclerts (esp. Catherine), and a number of other people whom I now view as old and close friends.

I have returned to France this year, at nearly age 65, purportedly for some research and some time off, but also to see my friends.  This started with a 100th birthday for Andree Marion on July 8.  Almost her entire family was present, her five children, and grandchildren from France, Belgium, Taiwan and Bangkok.  They all gathered for a mass at her church in Auteuil, a large modernist space facing a garden, and then for lunch facing another garden, at a restaurant somewhere near Versailles.  She looked absolutely, almost unchangingly, fine, with the same warm, but self-contained, bearing that I remember.  Her younger daughter, now leading a religious order, gave a fine speech about her independence.  And indeed, Andree Marion has been a very strong and thoughtful Catholic, living through the war in Lyons, widowed in her 40’s, completing the support and education of five children on her own, and introducing young Americans, like me into the difficult mysteries of French discipline and manners. I should add that for an American from northern California, with demonstrative, liberal, Jewish parents, and a Viennese-born mother (with an aversion to Europe) who had escaped the Holocaust, my introduction to French bourgeois education was somewhat difficult, vaguely familiar, and very satisfying.

 

Andre Marion, and those who love her

 

I had forgotten how beautiful Paris can be, the five and six story apartment buildings, the gardens, the walkable, relatively uncrowded streets, the refinements in so many people, in every meal and on nearly every corner.  One of the wonders of leaving New York is not having to avoid people to get anywhere.  I often wonder why some New Yorkers (and the city’s planning staff) think that New York’s ever-increasing density is so great.  Cities are great places, but good stores do not thrive on astronomical rents and civilized living is not about infinite height and crowding.

Catherine Duclert (now Yokoyama) had invited me to her family’s house at Pyla-sur-mer, a beach town on the Atlantic coast’s Arcachon Bay.  We took the high-speed TGV, through Bordeaux, to Archachon, with Emilie, her daughter who now lives in Tokyo, her sister-in-law, and two mostly-adorable granddaughters,  where we joined two of her brothers who share the house or rent nearby.

 

Catherine’s granddaughters visiting their French family

 

Pyla-sur-mer and Arcachon, just next to it, are beach towns, colonized by the rich in the late 19th century and continually expanded by the similarly affluent since.  The beaches are open to the public, and accessible every few blocks, with beautiful, stone free, white sand.  The water is cool, and superbly swimmable (for those with the courage to swim where they cannot see).  The bay is full of boats, and the houses range from huge 19th century confections to simpler, but still valuable, villas or bungalows, many in an exurban “basque” style.  A few blocks away, there was a nice grocer, with morning croissants and pain au chocolat, a reasonable wine selection and other basics, and a café that managed to give me “take-out” coffee.

 

Catherine Duclert Yokoyama, my old friend, a widow, and a grandmother

 

The highlights, of course, were the conversations (arguments) and the food–on euthanasia for example while eating magret de canard, or chez Hortense, the famous mussel and oyster restaurant, on Cap Ferret, after a taxi-boat ride across the Arcachon Bay.  (and before the others watched and celebrated France’s win of the World Cup)  Or at the marketplace in Teste de Buch, where we gathered wonderful vegetables and spent a small fortune at the charcutier, on magret, a ham, saucissons and other delights. Every day, so far, has been about eating something exceptional, no more than a monthly occurrence in New York (and only when either Stefani or Suzanne is cooking).

 

Emilie

 

 

chez Hortense

 

 

 

 

Posted in Commentary | 26 Comments

France: Some useful economic indicators

(June 2018)

Posted in Article | Leave a comment

France’s Economy and its Real Estate

(June 2018)

Posted in Article | Leave a comment

Money laundering and compliance in Europe

For those of you who do business in Europe, I post the attached article on money laundering and compliance issues as recently addressed by the French government.   The author, Alexandre Marion, is a compliance attorney in Paris, a friend and the son of old friends.

ENG 180514 – LTI REGULATORY ALERT

Posted in Commentary, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

THE CARLYLE GALLERY

(February 2018)

Posted in Article | Leave a comment

SUBWAY EXPANSION—ARE NEW YORK’S COSTS EXCESSIVE?

My City Club colleague John West distributed this, December 14, New York Times article on Friday.  https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/14/nyregion/mta-funding-real-estate-value-capture.html

It argues that the city’s construction of new mass transit lines, with public funds or debt, is a subsidy to property owners, who should instead be contributing.  For the first time, at a recent MTA board meeting, Carl Weisbrod, board member and former head of the City Planning Commission, argued that “some of the cost should be paid by the real estate development that new service will make possible.”  The MTA will now ask for legislation to make this “value capture” possible.

(Below:  Transit oriented development of the early 20th century,  108th Street and Broadway. )

Linking real estate development to transit charges is not a new concept.  As part of the recent Midtown East rezoning, builders of new high-rise office towers, are required to pay for improvements to designated subway stations.

These contributions may or may not be adequate, and it may or may not be appropriate to legislate some form of “value capture” tax as new transit improvements are planned.  But it is illegitimate to ask the public, or any particular constituency, be they riders or real estate owners, to stretch their pocket books unless the system is also held accountable for its costs.

A simple Google search found three articles that detailed how expensive our transit system has become.

Vox–January 2017–This article reports that the second phase of the Second Avenue subway is budgeted at $6 billion, or $2.2 billion per kilometer, with only $1 billion allocated the MTA’s capital budget.  Yet the $1billion should be adequate, with Berlin, Paris and Copenhagen subways budgeted at respectively $250 million, $230 million and $260 million per kilometer.  Labor costs are only part of the problem, as there are certainly strong unions in western Europe. The size of the stations and the depth of the subway line also drive up costs.   https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/1/1/14112776/new-york-second-avenue-subway-phase-2

Pedestrian Observations—July 2017—Vox reporting relies in part on an article in this public transit blog, written by Alon Levy.  It compares the per kilometer costs of NYC transit projects with those in other countries.  The results are shockingly negative for New York, even when compared to transit construction costs in London and Amsterdam.  Phase 1 of the Second Avenue subway is cited at $1.7 billion, with a London project cited at $450 million per kilometer and an Amsterdam project cited at $410 million per kilometer.  https://pedestrianobservations.com/2011/05/16/us-rail-construction-costs/

Curbed—October 2017—This analysis, also by Alon Levy, compares NYC subway’s operating costs to those in other cities.  New York subway’s hourly and per mile costs are exceeded by our PATH system and by the hourly cost of Los Angeles Metro Rail.  They are comparable to the hourly and per mile costs of the Boston T, but exceed cited costs in other cities, including  in western Europe. https://ny.curbed.com/2017/10/13/16455880/new-york-subway-mta-operating-cost-analysis

 

 

 

 

Posted in Commentary | 1 Comment

EXPLORING THE MALAISE AT THE UPPER END OF THE MANHATTAN HOUSING MARKET

(November 2017)

Posted in Article | Leave a comment

RETAIL

(October 2017)

Posted in Article | Leave a comment

The Midtown East Re-zoning, an Improvable Plan

Members of the City Club (cityclubny.org) met with New York City Council Land Use Staff and a representative from City Councilman Daniel Garodnick’s office to discuss changes to the zoning changes proposed for East Midtown.   The purpose of the zoning changes is to encourage development of large new, modern office buildings, near Grand Central Station and elsewhere in East Midtown.  These are due for a vote within the next few weeks.

The City Club believes that the logic and implementation of the proposed zoning changes are flawed.  Nevertheless, some version of these amendments is likely to be approved by the City Council, so our experts have developed detailed recommendations to mitigate their impact.

John West and Michael Kwartler explained their proposals, which include better protections of existing light and air regulations,  preservation of  existing midblock densities–the new tall buildings were intended for the wider avenues–and a greater priority on the creation of public open space.  Michael Gruen outlines the questionable legality  of selling additional density (bigger buildings) for money.

John West reviewed the unintended height of new buildings, on qualifying sites, if developers take advantage of both zoning lot mergers and the floor area bonuses available under the proposed amendments.  Below illustrates possible development at 360 Lexington Avenue, at 40th Street.  Following is a link to details on this and other examples.  E Mid – Hack (1)

Larry Sicular reviewed the required financial contributions proposed for development right transfers, from landmark buildings to the new development sites, suggested that the present proposal offers inadequate guarantees that public improvements will be adequately funded, and suggested an alternate method for determining the amount of the “tax”.  TDRContributionsLetterhead

Readers should call the Manhattan Borough President’s Office (Gail Brewer, 212-531-1609),  Councilman Dan Garodnick’s office (212-818-0580), and their own City Council member to express their displeasure.

Posted in Commentary | Leave a comment