My Mother’s American Life

for Sophie

My sister says that she was “magnetic”.

At our mother’s funeral twenty-two years ago, my sister’s two-year-old daughter, Sophie, cried and said, “My grandmother died, and I didn’t even know her.” 

When I remember her, my throat tightens and my heart opens.

Alice Grün was born on March 20, 1928, according to the birth certificate we still have, issued by the Israelitischen Kultusgemeinde, that is the Jewish Community in Vienna.  She was her father’s third child and her mother’s first.  Her father, a widower, had remarried.  Alice was the youngest, the only girl, the only biological child of her mother, and she had two protective older brothers.

As a grown woman, Alice was beautiful, not in an expected or predictable way, but with a strong nose, light skin, auburn, later blond, hair, and blue green eyes that changed with the light.  She carried herself with style and a little mystery.    

Alice wasn’t tall, but she had a strong presence, engaging and direct, at other times reserved.  Maybe she let her guard down with her friends; otherwise she only showed her vulnerability at home.  She was aware, fashionable, more so than most women around her, more visually sophisticated, a bit more noticeable.  She carried herself differently, perhaps like some of the women I have met in Vienna, and she dressed in an informal, careful, California style: slacks, simple dresses, very little make up.  As a young mother, she had her eye on sales at I. Magnin, the fashionable Bay Area department store.  In India she wore saris; in Singapore she had dresses made. In her later years, she went to small, interesting shops in Los Gatos or Santa Cruz.  She was not afraid of color, occasionally pushing the edges of convention, and she tried to encourage her daughter to dress with a little more daring.  

Although not always disciplined in her emotions—Alice certainly did not hold back at home—she was strict in her personal habits.  She was up early on weekday mornings.  Her house was orderly and clean.  She took care of herself and her children. 

During their first year in California, in the early 1950s, George and Alice rented a house on the east side of San Jose then moved west to Los Gatos, an older 19th century town at the foot of the Santa Cruz mountains. They bought a new, three bedroom tract house on Azalea Way for $17,000, and lived there with their children for about twenty years.  Yesterday, walking on Glenridge Avenue, in an older section of town, I remembered coming with them to look at a larger house for sale, overlooking the downtown, but they decided that paying for our college educations was more important. 

Alice’s parents had owned a restaurant in Vienna, and Alice began cooking as a teenager in New Jersey, after school while her mother was at work.  She was good at it, occasionally making a few dishes from her childhood, schnitzel, risibisi (rice and peas), red cabbage with apples.  Her food was as she was, something from someplace else, mostly American. 

Alice spent a lot of time talking to her friends, over coffee at home, and very frequently on the phone.  She talked while sitting on her bed, her back against the headboard and her legs straight in front of her.  These conversations were lengthy. Calls east to her father or her brothers were briefer and rarer.  Cross-country telephone connections were more complex; distance was more significant.    

Alice was attentive, considerate, courteous. There were visitors to the house, a varied circle over time: friends for coffee, dinners, parties, lots of conversation.  Alice talked and listened; we could hear her laugh across the house.  Our friends were welcomed, asked questions, invited to speak.  The men were doctors, lawyers, professors, business owners, engineers, military officers (in India).  Many of the women were educated but most no longer worked.  There were exceptions.  Helen Monday  was a successful interior decorator;  Miriam Resnick co-authored several books.  In California, most friends lived nearby, in Los Gatos, Saratoga, Willow Glen; later my parents had friends in Santa Cruz, Soquel, Aptos.  Alice was one of the few women working full time (beginning in her forties), cleaning teeth to educate her children. Yet her work never seemed to affect her confidence, her stature, her social sense, her manner, although it affected her outlook.  She was nearly always the most glamorous woman in the room.  

George and Alice processed people differently; my father liked everyone and enjoyed information exchange; Alice was discerning and more personally engaged.  Living abroad, or when we were guests, she told us to watch and follow. Watching taught me when and where I could have elbows on the table, which cutlery to use, where to lean when served, when and how to talk to different types of people and to people I had never met, how to listen.  Alice cared how people treated each other, about appearance, about aesthetics, but she did not care about formality.  It was the intent, the discipline, the ability to adapt; she expected us to pay attention.

Guests were greeted, listened to, answered.  Adults were not called by their first names until we were well into our twenties.  As children, we were asked to join guests at dinner parties in the living room, for a few minutes before bed, to say hello, to answer questions.  It was not acceptable to speak disrespectfully. At times, Alice was intense, angry, but at home and generally with her husband.  I don’t remember angry or rude behavior outside the house.

My mother enjoyed attention; she knew how to draw people in, but her great social skill was her ability to come out of herself, to show her interest, to encourage people to talk, to really listen.  She had extremely close friends, and these friendships with other women were very important.  

I never saw her encourage a man or flirt.  She danced with her husband occasionally in public, and they kissed sometimes, but it was affectionate and hardly suggestive.  Neither of my parents spent time alone with friends of the opposite sex.  That was their generation; they were not alone in this.

Alice was well liked, and she liked others.  That didn’t stop her from being critical; she enjoyed analyzing human behavior. As an older child and teenager, I talked with her often.  She had a way of looking at things that commanded my attention, and I identified with her point of view.  It took me years to see its weaknesses. Without remembering them precisely these conversations were often while she was sitting in her phone-call position in the bedroom.  We talked about people and circumstances, about why people were the way they were and how to handle them.  What I learned from her was the enjoyment of understanding what makes people tick.

Occasionally someone found Alice to be “too much”, too inquiring, too many questions, perhaps too insistent, that is, occasionally, insecure.  This was particularly true of my sister’s men.

Alice Grün was loved, but history did not give her a protected childhood.  Her father, Max, was from Dembitz, a town east of Krakow in Austrian Galicia, a progressive rabbi and midwife’s son.  Her mother, Klara (née Landau), came from further east, somewhere near Lviv, the daughter of a wealthy farmer.  They were among the many Orthodox Jews that moved to Vienna from the eastern provinces.  Neither of  her parents was formally educated but they had the training and skills to start businesses and to earn.  Max went to work early, moved to Vienna sometime before World War I, and purchased a small apartment building in his father’s name in the Ottakring district.  He then served in the Austrian army during the war.  Klara moved to Vienna with her family at the beginning of the war, trained as a wig maker (for orthodox women) and started a successful business in Leopoldstadt, Vienna’s largely Jewish 2nd district.

After they married, Klara joined Max in the Ottakring,  his two small boys, George and Jack, then baby Alice (1928), Klara’s parents and her sister, Dora.  They started a small restaurant on the ground floor, then bought a second building and opened a larger one.  My grandmother closed her wig business.  Her very long blond hair was gathered up but uncovered.  A younger sister married; Dora divorced. Max stopped wearing a yarmulke in the restaurant.  The sisters lost their mother in 1934, then their father in 1938.  

When the Nazis annexed Austria in early 1938, that life ended.  As described by her brother, George, the Gestapo came to the house, while the three children and Dora hid on the floor under the table. The Nazis knocked and tested the lock, until a neighbor told them that no one was at home.  Alice was shoved down a flight of stairs at school; a childhood friend was forbidden to see her.   

Max was arrested.  Klara dressed herself up, walked to the police station and talked her husband out of prison. Didn’t they want the Jews to leave?, she asked.  They had visas pending she argued (since most of the family was already in the US).  Affidavits and visas were eventually obtained, and in January 1939, the Grüns left in the middle of the night, by train to Bremen, and then on the Hamburg-Amerika line to New York.  Their property was seized.  Aunt Dora disappeared.  Research by our Vienna lawyers in 2021 indicated that she was deported to Minsk in November 1941. 

The rest of Alice’s life is an American story.  She assimilated, discarded her Austrian clothes and the German language, and spoke English with an American accent. As an eighth-grade graduate she was given the DAR award. Her brothers joined the American army and the invasion of Europe. 

Alice, a young immigrant

with her parents in Austria or the Catskills, late 1930’s, early 1940s

According to her high school yearbook, Alice wanted to study psychology.  She was admitted to Rutgers University in New Jersey, but her parents did not support a four-year college education.  They were practical and wanted her to be independent, and for them that was learning a skill to make a living.  Alice enrolled in a two year dental hygiene program at Columbia University in Manhattan.  Much later, in her 50’s, after we had finished college, she went back to school and finished her own liberal arts degree at the University of San Francisco.

Alice did not hide her refugee status, but she didn’t discuss it much. It was in the background, a sometimes badge of honor, witness to centuries of victimhood, a trauma that was not readily visible, something in the past, not in our present.  She was an articulate and capable mother, clear in what she expected, adaptable, able to handle nearly everything.  She knew how to fit-in without being inconspicuous.  She conveyed pride, confidence, control.  She could be reserved, but often she was friendly and outgoing, warm to those she liked or trusted.

Alice was not always composed at home.  On a rainy evening, when we were very young, and George was over an hour late, she was “sure” he’d had an accident or was dead.  She was hysterical when he showed up, enraged.  Years later, when her daughter was in graduate school, and couldn’t be reached at a late hour, she insisted that George call the New Haven police. (My sister had a boyfriend.)  When I told her that I was gay, she was afraid that something terrible would happen, although, to her credit, she worked that out with her therapist.  In those years, I did not relate any of this to her history.  To her, terrible things could happen, to us they never did.

Alice met George through Max’s sister Ida, who was a close friend of George’s mother. Ida had saved her niece for George and invited her to Queens to meet him after the war.  George could not refuse Ida, and he was smitten with Alice, even after a visit the next morning, and seeing her as he said “in the cold grey light of dawn”.  He proposed a week later—Alice agreed, though not immediately.  

George’s parents were poor; his father was an immigrant from Odessa and a drinker. Alice’s parents were not sure, but Ida vouched for him.  She saw something in this one; there were three other brothers she might have chosen.  George was a Cooper Union graduate, an engineer, perhaps already working on a graduate degree at Columbia.  Several in his family were educated, ambitious, successful, with some idea of their place in the world and their obligations to it.  My father carried these values forward, bringing Alice with him. 

George and Alice were married in 1948.  The photo album shows a large, traditional wedding, with a white dress and bridesmaids, the American kind, but Alice was not the kind of woman who talked about weddings.  She was interested in femininity, but her focus was not on baby showers or pregnancies.  She wasn’t satisfied with the constraints of traditional marriage.  She wanted to create something else for herself and for her daughter, and that is what she did.

There was a housing shortage after the war, and Max and Klara bought a four-unit building in Belleville, New Jersey to house the newly married couple. They offered to give the building to my parents, but George declined, preferring to support his family himself.  When her mother died in the late 1950s, Alice received a significant inheritance, but her father asked her to return it, to start a new business.  The men managed these things in the earlier years, but over time, George and Alice managed their work and their money together, and they were good at it.  In the 1960s, there were arguments at the dinner table about why George hadn’t finished his Phd.  Maybe it was the increased salary, or the status, or simply his professional success, but in later years Alice focused more on what she was doing, and on the money she was making.

Newly married Alice, the daughter of affluent parents, went into New York and spent two weeks’ salary on a suit at B. Altman’s;  George poured a bucket of water on the floor to scrub the floor army-style. These were (among) their first disagreements.  For years, Alice wore the pink and grey tweed suit for air-travel.  Dad did the painting or the outside work (until he could afford to pay someone else); mopping floors was no longer his responsibility.

The couple wanted children, and Alice had three or four miscarriages.  George reached out to his aunt, Adele, a physician in Manhattan, who referred them to a doctor on West End Avenue, not far from where I live now.  Pregnant again with me in 1953, Alice was told to rest in bed for three months.  (Her daughter came much more easily.) 

My mother loved me intensely, no less. By that I do not mean that she was easy on me; she wasn’t.  It is more that she wanted me, felt for me, was concerned for me, saw and appreciated me, believed in me, fundamentally, as I was.  My father believed in what his children could accomplish and did what he could to prepare us.  My mother understood.  By chance or design we were somewhat similar, so she sensed my feelings.  This had consequences.  It was hard to differentiate from her, but it was reinforcing. 

George and Alice moved to northern California in 1954, where George took a teaching position at San Jose State, and their lives changed completely.  They created a new existence, independent of their families and their histories, relying instead on each other.  They focused on their children, eventually on their friends, their desires and their values.  Their first home, a tract house on the east side of San Jose, was likely chosen because it was near campus.  There are photos at this house of Terry, their daughter, who was born in San Jose, of us, two children, with Alice’s parents and with George’s mother.  

In San Jose, they had pork chops, a freedom they didn’t have near Alice’s family and her rabbi grandfather.  For some years, Alice baked them in a white and green ceramic casserole, thoroughly, and with rice that had absorbed the flavorful juices.  The chops were always white and dry as cardboard; pork had to be well done.  My father didn’t like seafood, so shrimp was a treat when he wasn’t at home.  Generally, Alice and George loved good food and encouraged their children to try everything.  When we were out, and their food was good, they encouraged us to try it, but I reacted by wanting to protect my plate. 

In 1955, my parents bought a new house in a subdivision in Los Gatos.  It was a typical ranch house, on one floor, with three bedrooms and an open plan around a fireplace core, vaguely influenced by Japanese design, with huge windows to the back yard and garden.  Los Gatos was a nice older town, with good schools and a beautiful location at the foot of the Santa Cruz mountains.

Alice and George in the Sierras, an American couple

Now, Alice and George were no longer immigrants or the children of immigrants.  They had simply stepped into the American professional class, like other young couples around them.  California, the suburban Bay Area where they lived, was an ahistorical place.  Nearly everyone had moved there from someplace else. Their pasts were not secrets, but they did not matter.  George was a serious reader of European history, but Europe and the War were far away.  Alice did not identify with Austria or with Europe, quite the opposite; she rejected those identities. She did not speak German and banned books about the concentration camps from the house.  Judaism was what she kept; it was her history; it underlay her outlook, her value system, and her view of family, although she did not study it until years later.  She fused it into her American and California identities, and into her liberalism, and she assimilated. 

Alice on Azalea Way in Los Gatos

Alice was always busy, up early, cleaning, running errands, cooking, taking classes, lots of exercise classes.  She dieted frequently and made healthy meals; she was discerning.  She knew what was good and what wasn’t, and she was very clear about it.  There was nearly always meat or fish and always a salad, dressed and tossed in a large, oiled, wooden bowl.  She often added chopped green onion and made the dressing herself, a blend of oil and vinegar, salt, pepper, and herbs.  There were no bottled dressings; there were no processed foods.  Some desserts were too sweet, she said.

My parents liked to eat outdoors, so when the weather was good, we often sat on the back patio. George had built a large wooden trellis.  He never added a roof, but Alice planted a wisteria that eventually covered it entirely and with long purple flowers in the spring. 

My parents ate out frequently, often driven by Alice’s sense of adventure or work schedule.  When we were very young, this was limited and too expensive, but in Singapore in the late 1960s, it was at least weekly, on the cook’s night off.  We were at Chinese banquets, food stalls in the car park on Orchard Road, a fancy Russian restaurant for George’s favorite,  “shashlick”.  In later years, when Alice worked, we ate out during visits home, at any of  a number of local restaurants in Los Gatos.  There was a very good dessert soufflé, at a French restaurant on Santa Cruz Avenue, the kind of pleasure my father encouraged.  When Alice and George moved to La Selva Beach, south of the city of Santa Cruz, in the late 1980s, the habit continued: lunches in Monterey or downtown Santa Cruz, coffee in Aptos. I loved one place in particular, India Joze, modernist, facing a garden, wonderful, now closed.

In the early years in Los Gatos, Alice joined the League of Women Voters, where she made close friends, some of whom we knew years later.  But we were her focus.  She spent endless hours talking with us, driving us to school, to the library, to her friends, to her mother-in-law’s nursing home, nursery school, music lessons, swim practice (for me), baton twirling or horseback riding (for my sister), religious school, Hebrew school, food and clothes shopping, my Bar Mitzvah. She made sure we did our homework, read my papers and told me where to clarify them. Yet by today’s standards, we had a fair amount of independence. I walked or biked to school and friends’ houses, and stayed occasionally for dinner (if I called).  She never interfered with my friendships, even later when they merged with attractions, which she noticed. 

with her children, perhaps at Fallen Leaf Lake, late 50s, early 60s

In the 1950s and early 60s, George and Alice were tennis players.  They were early members of the Los Gatos Swim and Racquet Club, a utilitarian place with tennis courts where we spent summers by the pool.  Alice gave up tennis before we were teenagers, but George was hooked well into his 80s.  For Alice, diet, health and appearance were important.  She exercised regularly and dressed carefully, mostly informally as I have written, but also in hats, gloves, nylons in the earlier years, lipstick, face creams, and some make up.  There was a dressing table with a mirror in her bedroom.  Almost the entire bedroom closet was reserved for her.  George’s overflow was relegated to my room, or later—perhaps after she noticed my resistance—to a redone hallway closet.   

Alice wanted and enjoyed a nice house, and Helen Monday, a close friend, was a talented interior decorator.  Furniture, drapes, and carpets were selected and custom ordered.  In the early years, everything was new; nothing came from the past.  The house was modest, but the presentation pulled together. It was modern, what we now call mid-century. There were no western antiques, no family photos or inherited things; actually they were somewhere, but not displayed until later in her life.  Alice enjoyed finding art and objects when we were in Asia.  To prepare for a trip to Bali, she read about the artists, and we visited one or two studios where she chose portraits, one of a young man and the other of a young woman.  These are now in my upstate library and living room.

Alice at Gail Maddux’s wedding, 1960s

Azalea Way, Los Gatos, 1960s

A party in George and Alice’s  backyard, Los Gatos 1960s: from left, Bill Lorell, Evie Lorell, Lilian Nerenberg, Doris Maddux, Edie Mae Stutzman with “Stutz”

Eventually, Alice began to look backwards.  After paying for our educations, in the 1970s, she and George bought an old craftsman house on Peralta Avenue, not far from the Glenridge house they had previously declined, a house that reminded her of her parents’ house in Caldwell, New Jersey. In the pantry, she displayed blue onion Czech dishes that her parents had brought from Europe.  Photographs and family portraits were retrieved and framed.  

At the far end of the kitchen, there was a breakfast table in a windowed bay overlooking  the back garden and the pool.  It was a square English table, probably bought with Helen, and it was usually covered with a batik cloth, placed at an angle exposing the table’s edges.  We had breakfast there in the morning, young adult children visiting.  Dad offered eggs, if we wanted them, sunny side up or scrambled. There was coffee, fruit, toast, often bagels, cheese.  Sometimes, depending who was there, we’d talk, the two, three or four of us, for half an hour, for an hour or more, sometimes until eleven.  Usually it was sunny; it was California; it was intimate, warm, secure, and in those years I did not realize that it wouldn’t last forever.  

Our calm, somewhat typical, suburban childhood had ended in the early 1960s, not due to any misfortune but to my father’s choices.  He accepted a teaching position in India, through the Agency for International Development (AID), the agency that is now being dissolved by the Trump administration.   

As was often the case in the earlier years of their marriage, George came up with the big professionally-related changes.  My mother controlled the house, social life, our upbringing. 

Yet, as with the move to California, there must have been a sense of adventure.  There was no indication that she objected to the India posting, nor to a later two-year position in Singapore.  She put a lot of energy and work into them, packing, shipping, vaccinations, a house to empty and rent out, new households to set up.  In Asia, there were new schools, uniforms, friends, entertaining . . .  entirely new places. 

In India, at eight years old, I was enrolled at the Woodstock School, an American missionary boarding school in the Himalaya mountains. My father chose it after reading that the colonial elite had sent their sons away to school.  Surprisingly my mother did not object, although she deftly managed my transfer to a local Catholic school after five or six months.

Alice adapted to household servants and guests, made friends, and entertained frequently.  In India people stopped by in the early evening, unannounced, for appetizers and drinks; she had to be ready, and we sometimes ate alone while my parents were with friends on the front veranda.   

In Singapore social life was more predictable, although our Indian cook, James,  complained one evening when asked to delay serving dinner for late-arriving guests.  Alice was used to controlling her house and kitchen, but she adjusted to her 60-something year old cook, staying mostly out of his way.  He knew how to read, and she gave him recipes.  The servants worked for her and for my father, she said.  For us, they were adults. 

“Your country is judged by your behavior”, she told us.  Alice was talented, friendly, articulate, attractive, able to adapt without hiding.  In India, she socialized with Indian couples and military officer’s wives, westernized and likely to speak English, in Singapore with Chinese friends, other American women, some Israelis.  We travelled regionally, in India and in southeast Asia, later through Europe.  Much of this was organized by my mother.  In the 1960s the family of an American academic travelled fairly well.  The hotels and restaurants were a bit better than those I frequent now.  Alice was organized, composed.  Only in Austria was she displeased.  At a hotel in the Austrian Alps, the owner became friendlier after she saw George’s signature stamp, on a letter, and addressed her as Frau Professor.  This did not flatter Alice.

with George and his students at their house in Adam Park, Singapore, 1967-1969

She was an immigrant and her husband the son of immigrants. Despite these outside influences in their childhoods, they were in the background of their adult lives.  We were Americans at home or when traveling abroad, but with a talent for adapting.  This was a playbook that we children learned well: how to blend in without hiding; how to attract some, but not too much, attention and respect.  How to join in while retaining our separate identities. Where or how did Alice learn to do this?  Perhaps her mother, or she might have said that this was necessary for a young newly-arrived Jewish woman adapting to American non-Jewish society. 

Yet for many Jews, this is not the focus. In New York, we assimilate less;  perhaps it isn’t necessary to a sense of belonging, but in places where Jews are a tiny minority, blending-in is common.  This was Alice’s experience through most of her life, and it was mine until I moved to New York. 

Alice (center), with her father, Max, his third wife, Hannah, George and me, (bar mitzvah), October 1967

Just once, a young American teacher in India, with training in linguistics, asked my mother if she was foreign-born.  Otherwise it was not visible, and there were relatively few foreigners in my parents’ California life. There was Bill Lorell, an Austrian, my father’s friend, teaching colleague, and business partner.  He taught with George at the City College of New York and again at San Jose State, and he lived not far away in a house in the mountains above Los Gatos.

Bill was handsome, sophisticated, Viennese, ¼ Jewish, enough to flee the Nazis.  Alice was friendly but did not identify with him. Their common language was English; she was not an admirer; she did not like the way he went through women—four wives as I remember it.  There was Ralph Parkman and his wife, Yetty, a refugee from Holland.  Ralph was another colleague of Dad’s, a low key kind of guy, and they lived in our neighborhood.  Alice liked the Parkmans but was not close to them.    

Alice did not seek others who shared her experience, but her circle of close friends always included American-born Jewish women.  In in the 50s and early 60s, she was very close to Rebecca Carter,  the wife of another close colleague of my father’s.  Alice loved Rebecca, she said, and we were close to her children. Other close friends were Miriam Resnick and Peggy Hall, educated, interesting, informed, open-minded, women whom we knew and loved.  In later years, in Santa Cruz, there was Judith Berman, a younger woman, different from the others, but I cannot say how.  Many of Alice’s friends were not Jewish,  Doris Maddux, Helen Monday, and in earlier years Edie Mae Stutzman, who died fairly young.  These friendships lasted for years, for most of her lifetime, all except Rebecca.  These women were sophisticated, articulate, friendly, some very attractive.  It took a lot of traveling and living in supposedly grander places to realize it; at the time, I had no basis for comparison.

Education and ethics were George and Alice’s stated priorities; we were expected to behave according to their standards and to study seriously, which we did.  They wanted us to go to the best colleges possible, but George’s academic salary and consulting earnings were insufficient to pay for the educations they planned.  So following perhaps several conversations in their bedroom, after we had returned from Singapore (1969), Alice went back to school and updated her credentials in dental hygiene.  She then worked for a number of years, using her salary to pay tuitions and room and board at Princeton and Pomona College.  I was then helped with living expenses for business school at Columbia; my sister may have gotten some help in graduate school at Michigan and Yale.  My mother was proud of her contribution to what was also a family accomplishment.   

Alice knew how to focus her energy, and she was flexible.  She moved willingly from the role of young mother/housewife to running houses with servants, and then to cleaning teeth in Los Gatos.  All and none of these roles defined her.  What did affect her, early, was Betty Friedan’s, The Feminine Mystique, which was published in the early 1960s.  Alice saw herself in that book.  She went back to work and changed.  She valued her ability to earn and shifted the balance of power at home.  She asked  Dad  to take on more household chores.  Generally, he  supported what she wanted, and the changes were significant, but they were limited.  Things at home were still to her standards; once we were out of school, she quit and changed jobs as she wished, a freedom that George never allowed himself.  Alice had a strong, reliable husband, and she knew it.  In her 60’s, in her Bat Mitzvah speech, she called him her protector, but for some years she resented that she needed him.

Alice had some very interesting work, but she lacked her husband’s education and the years invested.  She started late and did not have the skills or confidence to gain seniority or income at his level.  At some point in her 60s, she was hired as a consultant.  She wrote a report on the computer in the early days of word processing but lost the entire document.  George encouraged her to reconstruct it, but she couldn’t.  She simply said that she was unable to complete the assignment.  This would have been impossible for my father or for her children.  Alice was capable, but she wanted more for us than she felt able to achieve.

So she focused on my sister.  While Alice’s relationship with Terry was occasionally combative, my sister’s independence was very important to her.  In this, she was somewhat like her parents, but without the limitations they had placed.  Her daughter earned a doctorate in economics at Yale and became a professor, eventually teaching at Stanford, Harvard, and the University of Western Ontario.  My mother said  “You can have sex and not get married.” and “You can have a man and not need one.”  These my sister did.

Alice’s daughter Terry, Los Gatos, 1970s

Alice was always attractive and social, but in later years her priorities shifted.  She was somewhat less interested in assimilation, “fitting in”, beauty, social mobility.  These had already been achieved.  She became an activist, challenging the authority of the physicians she had previously admired.  She was involved in the dental hygiene association, with an eye to increasing professional autonomy.  She was appointed to a county health planning board whose mandate was to spread resources among hospitals and avoid expensive duplication.  She got involved in health care policy through her job as the health care representative of the chair of the County Board of Supervisors.  She and George became pro-gay activists on my behalf (or as an antidote to her fear).  She had become more economically independent, as she evolved into the activist wife of her long-time activist husband.  In her 50s and 60s, Alice was outspoken in her own right, a phenomenon. 

Alice loved the beach, and in the mid 1980s she and George bought a new townhouse near La Selva Beach, south of Santa Cruz.  They sold their last place near Los Gatos, and after a few years of driving back and forth over the Santa Cruz mountains, made the beach place their primary residence.

Alice retired from her county job and then made another significant shift.  She embraced Judaism seriously and systematically, more than she had previously, focusing on her own religious education and spiritual life.  She was active in the reform synagogue in Aptos; she encouraged the synagogue to sponsor gay commitment ceremonies; she ran the adult education program;  she studied and, in her 60s, she became a Bat Mitzvah.  There was a service and a luncheon; she invited her family and many of her old friends.  It was a public event, with a speech, and she described herself as no longer afraid to be a Jew. 

Alice loved Santa Cruz.  She said that that her years there were the best in her life. She kept her old friends, made new ones, loved walking on the beach and the open-minded culture.  When visiting our long talks continued, with her, with her and my father, but always somehow, I felt closer to her.  We were rarely four.  Terry and I had our own schedules and our own trips. We were together for major events, George’s 70th   in San Jose,  Alice’s Bat  Mitzvah in Aptos, later Dad’s 80th in Palm Desert, and at the end, their funerals.  Speeches were part of what was expected ; we knew how to write and how to give them.

Alice at La Selva Beach, Santa Cruz County, California, late 1980s or early 90s

Alice with her brothers, George (l) and Jack (r) Greene

When I was in Santa Cruz,  I joined my parents at the synagogue.  We walked on the beach, went out to lunch or to dinner, and they cooked.  We drove downtown and occasionally to Monterey.  My visits were brief;  Alice and George could be a bit much for me.  I’d break up my trips, drive up to the city for a few days to see friends, then back again before returning to New York. The visits were warm and close, filled with conversation and fairly frequent, perhaps twice a year.  George and Alice also visited: my sister in London, Ontario, with her difficult first husband, later with Kim, the wonderful second one.  In New York, they sometimes stayed with me, but my apartment is small, and they usually rented somewhere when they came together.  Alice and George had family and old friends in New York and New Jersey, so visits with me merged into visits with them. 

Alice had setbacks in her 50s and 60s, but she found trusted women therapists to help her.  She told me this, presumably she told both of us as was my parents’ practice, but I was not yet mature enough to ask questions.  At some point, she said that she had been taking medication, that things had improved, and that she was taking herself off of the pills.  Now in her late 60s, Alice was in physical pain, from fibromyalgia, which was hard to treat.  She slipped and started to get worse without getting better.  Something more was happening, and it was not just physical, but I was in my forties, living in New York, dealing with my own issues. 

Mom loved the rabbi in Aptos; he was inspiring, and George was on the synagogue board, but there was disagreement about the low salaries of the synagogue staff.  Some members are bragging about their expensive cars and their trips to Europe, my father said.  The rabbi would not speak up, a disappointment and contrary to my parents’ values.  For Alice it contributed to her internal crisis, and she quit her part-time job at the synagogue. 

For a time the fibromyalgia was under control.  Alice found a doctor in San Francisco who was helpful, but his methods were novel and his practice was shut down by a California state medical board.  Alice felt crushed, abandoned, consumed by pain, anxious, depressed, desperate. Her doctor had advised a move away from the humid coastal climate, from the place that she loved, and she insisted. 

She and George looked inland at Scott’s Valley in the Santa Cruz mountains, further south towards Monterey but none of this worked. Los Gatos was now expensive and no longer interesting.  So they moved much further south, to Palm Desert, in the late 1990s.

George adapted well, but moving did not help Alice.  She weakened further, her strengths receded.  “I am just an old woman here” she said.  “Nobody knows me or what I did.”  She withdrew, stayed indoors, stopped caring for herself—the opposite of whom she had been—and avoided even her closest friends.  She told a doctor that she was feeling suicidal, a doctor who didn’t know her, and she was committed for a few days to a psychiatric institution.  I was in Los Angeles, and my father asked me to come immediately.  I came to the psychiatric ward,  touched her feet, and the pain disappeared, but it came back the next day.  With the help of a college friend, George organized a stay at the Mayo Clinic pain center, in Minnesota, but that did not help.  

Alice had fantasized about marrying her children at the old house in Los Gatos; she had hoped that we would raise families nearby. Eventually, she realized that this was never going to happen. So she had let go of the fantasy, put the house on the market and negotiated its sale while George was recovering from heart surgery.  She no longer wanted it and no longer expected the weddings, but she still wanted a grandchild.

There was no chance of my having one.  Gay men couldn’t marry; gay marriages with children were not thinkable; we didn’t even want them.  My sister’s men were not Jewish; but that wasn’t the issue. Alice would bring the child to visit; she would Judaize her; she would take her clothes shopping.  Instead, my sister was a late bloomer, like me, busy with her studies and career, then divorced, so it looked like there might never be grandchildren. By the time Terry was with Kim and pregnant, Alice was sinking.  She was leaving, so I knew for sure that the child would come.  

Alice has a glamorous granddaughter, but when Sophie was born, it was too late for her to see the glamour or to know her.  Sometimes, I feel that I am raising my mother, my sister has said.  For some years, when I visited, I took Sophie clothes shopping. 

From Minnesota, George flew Alice to Los Gatos, to sessions with a trusted therapist, Bee Olender, but after several weeks, Alice was too much even for B, a survivor of the Japanese internment camps in Indonesia.  I joined them in Los Gatos, and we had a family session, a meeting where B encouraged Alice to step through her fear, but Alice said that she couldn’t. B met with me alone, to explain what was happening.  This wasn’t unusual for children who had survived the war, she said.  There are chemical changes in women as they age, she said;  as older survivors, they no longer had the will or the resilience that carried them earlier.

At Peggy and Bob Hall’s house, where we were staying, there were intense conversations, the two and three of us, and then a break, a separation between my mother and me. I cannot remember exactly what was said, but I remember detaching, perhaps to protect myself, something I have never really accepted or forgotten.  I had always been close to my mother, had always understood her thinking, but I didn’t want to go “there” with her, not to where she had gone.  Facing the loss of the person who had loved me the most,  I felt heartless.  I wanted her to let go, to take the risk, even of falling into the void she feared, but Alice could not, and I couldn’t bring her back. 

My father asked me to help him drive her back to Palm Desert.  I declined.  They stopped at my uncle’s in Los Gatos, on their way out of town, and Alice apologized to her sister-in-law, Frances, for the years she had not understood her depression and withdrawal.  She asked my uncle to drop by and check on me, which he did.

From beginning to end,  Alice’s illness lasted six or seven years. George took care of her, occasionally calling for support or help talking with her, but mostly, he handled everything.  He wouldn’t put her in a nursing facility; he’d had many good years with her, he said. 

Alice had withdrawn, from me, from everyone I think.  We no longer had conversations; she asked only a few questions.  Was I seeing anyone, she once asked, her constant worry.   For months, she phoned us, starting in the morning, to hear our voices, and the calls followed us throughout the day.  She wanted to hear her children, but she wouldn’t speak when we answered.  Frustrated for both of us, I told my father that I would not talk to her at all if she didn’t stop.  But she needs this he said, then he turned from the phone, “Alice . . . ” and told her what I had said;  the calls stopped.

The Nazis are outside she told her brother; she rarely left the house.  One night she came into the bedroom, wet from the swimming pool, and asked my father to kill her.  Eventually George took her to a psychiatrist;  she was medicated and calmed down.  The pain subsided, and she lived behind a veil, standing to eat, lying in bed.  (Yet she pushed herself to dress for George’s 80th and to briefly greet old friends.)

My mother died at 76, while Dad and I were in New Jersey at a party for her brother’s 50th wedding anniversary.  The call came as we left.  I was sure that she had timed it.  At the funeral in Santa Cruz, she returned to me and said,  “You and I have done everything we were meant to do together, and I have done what I was supposed to do for you. This is not about you and me.  It is about your father, and I want you to support him.” 

In leaving she was my mother again, reminding me of what I failed to realize, of what she expected, of what really mattered.   

February 2025

Posted in Commentary, Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Bobby’s oral history 

Among my unusual experiences in Austria was meeting other Jews my age (now 70) who grew up here.  In my first months in Vienna I wanted to swim and so contacted a group run by Hakoah, the Jewish sports club that was revived after the Second World War.  

I was told there was a shortage of lane space in the late-Covid swim environment, and I also understood by inference that my age and speed were not at the group’s level.  But the coordinator kindly told me about another group of swimmers, previously or presently affiliated with Hakoah, that meets informally at one of Vienna’s public pools, Stadthallenband, and she introduced me to Bobby Beig. 

Bobby is a very good and fit swimmer—at 75 he still competes periodically with Hakoah—and a very gracious and interesting man.  His parents returned to Austria after the Second World War, so he is Jewish and born and raised in Vienna.  To me, the American child of a Vienna-born refugee,  this was extraordinary, almost unthinkable.  I had known refugees, other than my mother—my father’s consulting business partner, a cousin, relatives when I was young—but before meeting Bobby (and then his friend Shimon), I had never met anyone Jewish who had grown-up and lived in Austria.  

The novelty of our meeting was I think mutual.  The Austrian government began offering passports to the direct descendants of refugees in 2021; my sister and I were among the earliest to apply.  I was among the first, or perhaps the first 70-year-old to knock at the Hakoah swim group’s door.  I have met other Austrians, but Bobby’s story was particularly compelling to me, so I asked him to allow me work with him on this oral history. 

Following are a few recorded interviews—my apologies for the quality of the recordings–together with notes from our conversations, which were later edited by me and by Bobby.  Listening, you will hear the story of two young people who escaped to England in the 1930’s, met, and returned together to Vienna in 1946 before Bobby’s birth in 1948.  You will learn how they got out and why they came back, about their work, their lives and their politics, and you will hear about Bobby’s grandmother who survived the concentration camp at Theresienstadt and lived with them.  You will learn about Bobby’s years in grammar school and at the University of Vienna, about his growing interest in the sciences,  his graduate studies, his teaching and working years as a physicist, and about his own family.  You will begin to know who Bobby is.  

I did these interviews to satisfy my personal interest.  There is something familiar about Bobby, like a brother or a cousin, despite the significant differences between us, and there is something hauntingly familiar about Austria.  Interviewing him I thought might explain these impressions to me.  They did and they did not.  

These recordings were also for Bobby’s grandchildren, so that they can know a part of where they come from, and permit themselves to be different.  Jews are interesting, somewhat unusual people.  We have the capacity for closeness and love with the people around us, but we are also unlike others, and there are bonds between us despite time and distance. 

These recordings are for Bobby, who can listen to his own thoughtfulness, be reminded that he is unusual and that he has had a fulfilling and successful life.   

Finally, these recordings are dedicated to Louise, Bobby’s partner, with thanks for the warm welcome in her heart and household, for wonderful meals at her apartment, and for ever-better conversations, as I slowly learn German, the language we left behind us and forgot.  

Larry Sicular

January 2024


Bobby Beig, Oral History Notes

Vienna, Austria

Notes on conversations, with some clarifications.  These were recorded on April 28,  May 5 and May 12, 2023 and  February 5 and  May 26, 2024

Session 1, Recordings 1 and 2

These recordings are for two people who are still very small, Bobby’s grandchildren, although we might decide that they will be of more general interest. 

Bobby grew up in an unusual family, in Vienna, after the War.  His outline:

  • Identity.
  • What is a Jew. 
  • Growing up in Vienna

How far should we go in defining identity?  I am not sure how far we should go.  How we see ourselves and how others see us.  I have a problem when an identity becomes highly noted—when people try to find their roots in a vague way—not like you coming to Vienna—but I want to distance myself from that.  But there is a bare minimum that my grandchildren should know. 

An identity requires distinguishability.  How we are seen and how we see ourselves, but I want to distance myself from anything mythical, I want something more light, something which is a bare minimum that my grandchildren should know when they want to know where they come from. 

Identity is a number of features, of properties, which I have, which includes experiences, things which I could list and refer to one by one.  Defining this is going to be tough, and there is one more complication, as I now am a 75 year old person.   It’s not quite the same person.  There is the person I am now, and the person who I was when I grew up.  These are two different things.  Of course I can look at things from my present point of view, and imagine how I perceived my life as a child.  

Things that define me today: I am a scientist.  I am striving for definitions and generality, my strength and my weakness.  Being a Jew is one of them, probably not the most important thing.  Without it, my life – at least the first 15 or 20 years of my life – cannot be explained.  The concept of a Jew is something baffling, even controversial.   Jews are first and foremost a religion, I guess; they are a tribe, by a gene test I did some time ago, I was identified as 100% Ashkenazi Jew, but I have no idea how accurate this is—there is probably no such thing as a pure Jew.  There are a number of things I associate with Jews, complicated things, there is a history of persecution of Jews, and they are associated with a number of stereotypes—these are not necessarily all wrong, we identify ourselves by some of them—smart people; we have a tendency for feeling guilty, a strong conscience.  The one thing I fully identify with, and which I associate with Jewry, is humor.  This is to me I think the most important feature.  There is something as a Jewish humor.   It has been said that there are many things of which one can accuse Jews.  We cannot be accused of a lack of humor. My father thought of himself as having a good sense of humor, but it was actually my mother who had a very natural sense of humor.  

My parents met in London in about 1940.  They both were emigrants from Austria; they had emigrated for racial reasons.  My mother was Jewish; my father’s parents had converted to Protestantism; my father was baptized as a Protestant.  They met in the middle of a group of exiled Austrians, maybe drawn together by homesickness.   My father had emigrated with his mother; his father had already died.  My mother had come to England on a Kinder transport. 

The organization where they met was called Young Austria.  It was quite unique in a way.  

My parents in England (1942?)

The unusualness of my upbringing in Vienna goes back to the unusualness of this group.  A group of people from Austria, opposed to Nazism; in the jargon of socialists/communists, they were anti-fascists.  Jewishness was not the main thing in this group.  It was political.  This group was communist, Stalinist.  This group of people was ordered after the war to return to Austria, probably by Moscow, but that has to be researched.  My ‘aunt’, actually my grandmother’s cousin—as  I grew up, she would visit us regularly, but she would never have dreamed of returning to Vienna.  That is true of most people I know, certainly of your mother.  My parents came back to Vienna in 1946.  I was born in 1948.  

Maybe we  could change perspective a little bit here, and talk how I perceived these things when I was a child.  

My mother was from a petty bourgeois family; my father’s family was slightly more bourgeois.  My father’s family were Hungarian and partly also from Czechoslovakia.   The roots of my mother’s family were wholly Czech.  In both cases they had been in Vienna for some generations.

My mother grew up in the 2nd district in an almost entirely Jewish area; she had almost no non-Jewish schoolmates.  This was in Leopoldstadt, also known as Matzesinsel—a word that was used back then and occasionally today.  She grew up in Tempelgasse, near the synagogue which was burned down in Kristallnacht, in a fairly modest environment; they were not poor, they even had for a time a farm girl to help them, she would sleep in the kitchen.  They were affluent enough to have that kind of help at home. 

My father’s father was a Prokurist (German), an authorized signatory.  He worked for the Credit Anstalt (CA), one of the leading banks in Austria, now with Bank Austria.  But he died in the early 1930’s, so my father was basically raised by his mother.  My father was Protestant by religion, but in those days in Vienna he was clearly discernable as a Jew.  He attended a grammar school in Vienna in the Döbling district, the same grammar school that my daughter attended, much later.  There were the pro-Nazi kids and pro-Jewish kids; my father was on the side of the Jews; of course there was antisemitism.  

There are several things that could be said in this connection.  There is an reference to this in a novel written by the nephew of a well-known Austrian writer, also my father’s schoolmate, an article on the last days of the Jewish boys in this school.  The book is in German,  by the Austrian-British author Michael Stone, Das Blindeninstitut. Bruchstück einer Jugend. Kupfergraben, Berlin 1991.  My father is mentioned in the book, in one or two sentences;  apparently he was bad in math, which was noted in the article.  The teacher was an anti-semite.  “With one equation with two variables, the Talmud won’t help you.”  (Very much later, my father was irritated by my interest in mathematics.)  

There was an exodus on this particular date of the Jewish children from this school.  The other children saw them leave, with strange feelings, and also the professors.  One of the children who left was the math teacher’s best student. The teacher was shocked; he didn’t know he was Jewish.  The child showed something that referred to his father’s suicide after the Anschluss.   This is very interesting.  It shows the relationships before the war, between Jews and non-Jews.  Yet this was before the Holocaust—our present perception is dominated by the Holocaust–yet even then everyone knew that something important was happening. 

My father’s family left–my father’s mother was entitled to a retirement pension because she was widowed, a pension that she received from the bank.  She was able to get this paid out and to use this money to leave; it was just she and my father.  They were not members of the Jewish community; I think they left in a Quaker transport.  But she left behind her sister and her mother; both of whom perished. 

Blanche Guttman, “Omama”,my paternal grandmother, 1950, born 1899

In my mother’s family, her brother had already left for Israel, and my mother was sent on a Kinder transport.  My grandparents were kicked out of their apartment, and lived in another apartment where a number of people were concentrated.  They were then sent to a concentration camp, Theresienstadt.   My grandfather died there a few days after liberation by the Red Army.  After the war, my grandmother came back to Vienna and stayed in a home for displaced people.  They had both contracted typhus; she survived with some heart condition.  He (my grandfather) was burned (cremated), for hygienic reasons, but his urn is nevertheless buried in the Jewish cemetery, which is normally not allowed.  My grandmother is also buried there, as is my mother. 

My father was not quite 16 in March 1938 (he was born in October 1922). The Gestapo once picked him up for a night but then sent home.  A woman living opposite to their house in Biedergasse had made an allegation that a Jewish boy had thrown a stone at a Hitler picture in her window; and that of course was a signal to Grandmother that they could not stay there.   She had been used to a comfortable life, even as a widow, it was a brave decision on her part.  In addition she left her sister and her mother, whom she was close to.  My grandmother told me, on her visits to Vienna after the war, that her mother came to Döbling from the 6th district, and would come to their place every day with the shopping and did the cooking.  Her mother had been a good cook and housekeeper. 

Session 1, Recording 3

I grew up in an unusual family, as Larry has said.  This is to some degree in retrospect.  For some time, I wasn’t aware of it.  There were some things though that I noticed and also I must say that I liked.  The fathers of other children in elementary school; most of them had been soldiers in the German army.  What that meant or was, on average, that the parents of my school mates were much older than my parents.  For the parents of my schoolmates, the time of the war was lost to these parents, whereas this wasn’t the case for my parents in England.  I was proud that my parents were young. 

The other thing was my parents had a lot of friends; I knew them.  I would call them by their first names, without calling them “uncle” which was more typical.  My parents were modern in questions of education.  For example, they did not believe in physical punishment.  I was slapped by my father, just once in my life, for a totally bad reason.  90% of my school mates were Catholics; I was officially without religion, so when there was religion in class, I was doing homework elsewhere.  These were the differences. 

My parents being communists, there was a contempt of religion.  They also considered Judaism to be unimportant somehow.  Communism in those days was opposed for example to Zionism.   Although my mother had a brother in Israel, who had fled to then Palestine, that was almost a non topic.  They had little contact.  I had some ideas why that was the case, but that’s a bit complicated.  I lived with my parents; I had no siblings.  There was my grandmother, a Holocaust survivor, as one would say today. Of course at the time I did not know what a Holocaust survivor was, nor what a Jew was. 

She was an important person for me.   She adored me; for her I could do no wrong.  There were some things that maybe were strange. On weekends, she insisted on not using the elevators; that was a matter of argument—she had a heart condition. I didn’t understand these things.  At some point my parents decided they had to explain something to me.  I was playing in a park, near the Belvedere near where we lived, and some other kids were singing an antisemitic song, which I found funny.   I came home and sang it, and my mother decided she had to explain.  Well you know, she explained the non-use of the elevator, her (grandmother) adhering to what she considered the rules of the Jewish religion. This is how I discovered being Jewish. I was in elementary school already by then. 

Of course this is an event that I remember.  It was certainly a sign of difference, I’m not sure how important it was.  I don’t remember that my early school years were affected by this. I had a school teacher a man, whom I liked and who liked me.   He certainly knew my family background, yet I was the only Jew in a class of 30.  My parents’ friends were practically all Jews.  They had children whom I knew. 

When my parents came back (to Austria) in 1946, my father would have been 24 and my mother 22.  My mother had no special training; she had simple office jobs.  My father had mostly done physical work.  For him, well his dream would have been to be a lawyer, but since he couldn’t finish his school career in Austria—maybe he could have tried–he thought he needed to work to support his family.  Immediately when they came back, there was no one here expecting them, other than the communist party.  The party gave them some help, an apartment, perhaps previously aryanized apartments.   My father worked for some time for an American newspaper, which he had to be allowed to do by the Party—maybe they thought he could get some information about the Americans.  Vienna  had been heavily affected by air raids in WW2. And of course there was poverty.  At some stage, my mother was asked to lead a group of young people.  Most of these young guys were not gangsters, but they were more or less delinquent young men.  She had to deal with them—some of them had become violent.  My mother was proud at having been able to handle these young kids.  My mother wasn’t very fearful.  

my mother with comrades of Young Austria (1943?)

My father, after some time, he worked for the  steel firm Wagner Biro, which was owned by the Russians. Later he worked for an insurance company.  My mother worked for a logistics service, that was owned by the communist party.  When my father’s salary was high enough, she stopped working. 

My parents friends were members of the communist party.  Some worked for the party, but most of them had other jobs. They were also friends and met on a private basis.  My parents did small amounts of volunteer work for the party for a number of years, but that stopped after some time.  There was an organization within the party, trying to help people rent apartments.  One could be a member of that organization, and they collected fees for membership. 

Of my grandmother’s experience in Theresienstadt I know little; it was not really discussed.  My mother told me much later, after her death, that my grandmother would have been quite willing to talk about her own experience, but somehow nobody would have wanted to listen, including her, her daughter.  The story that she told me was my grandfather had some function as a guard.  The Nazis used Jews in some kind of self-organization in the camps.  There was something like this at Theresienstadt.  My grandmother said something about this to my mother, about this role of her husband, in a proud way.  My mother recalled having said something nasty to her.  This must have been connected to the fact that my parents, particularly being communists, believed in resistance to the Nazis.  This role was to them a form of collaboration. My mother described herself as something of a Daddy’s girl. The “wrong” person had survived.  This contradicted her image of him.  My mother’s negative reaction ended the conversation; my grandmother was offended.   

my maternal grandmother, “Omi”, grandfather, her mother (1930’s, before the war)

After the Anschluss, my grandfather tried to look after the family, somehow to postpone the deportations, not only for his wife, but also for his mother in law.  My grandmother had two brothers.  One, Otto Fischer, was a football star and later football coach who perished in Latvija. 

(Note added: there is a book about his life: “Otto ‘Schloime’ Fischer – a Jewish football star”, by A. Juraske.) The other one, Hugo Fischer, was in forced labor. There were small labor camps all over Austria.  When these labor camps were shut down, everyone went back to their places, and then they were all deported to death camps. Thus Hugo, together with his wife and daughter, ended up in Auschwitz. 

My parents came back in 1946.  My grandmother had been in a home after the liberation; after some time, they took her in to live with them because they considered it their duty.   Much later, I did not think this was such a good decision.  But this is what they did.  She was there when I was born.  She did no professional work of any kind; for women of her upbringing this was not an option.  She lived with us; at the time when my mother did office work in the logistics firm, she would sometimes cook in the evening, but my grandmother would warm up the lunch for us to have together.  Then she disappeared for a nap; the story was that even as a young woman she napped.  That was talked about by my parents in a derogatory fashion.  She wasn’t as much respected as I think she deserved.

My grandmother was there when I came home from school.  I felt close to her.  She passed away in 1976, when I was 28.  To my grandmother, being Jewish was an obvious thing.  I cannot recall.  Of course, there were situations where this would have been obvious, but it was not something that she carried forward.  There were funny scenes.  Like many Jews, she was from a social democratic background, so having a social democratic chancellor that was also Jewish, Kreisky, was somehow wonderful.  The fact that he was critical of Israel, where her son lived, didn’t really matter. 

Omi, my parents and me (1954?)

My mother’s brother was never happy in Israel and lost an arm in an accident.  When he died, my parents consulted the family doctor, who was from the same circle: he said to my mother that her mother would not survive the news.  So my parents decided that my grandmother would not know of his death.  They hid it from her, and even wrote fake letters and they took away letters.  She did not know.  They somehow had him vanish.  Maybe this is something that relates back to communist ideology, at least it’s not completely unrelated.  When Mao died, he officially didn’t die.  They had actors appear on the balcony, pretending to be Mao for some time.   My grandmother talked about her son, and they kept the subject down.   

There were some things that separated me from my school mates, but they didn’t matter to me so much.  I was in a grammar school that was a public school in the continental sense.  At the age of 15, I moved from a sexually mixed class to a boys’ class, at a time of puberty. I was a child not very good at defending myself.  Then there was the time when there was antisemitic mobbing. 

There was something called humanistic grammar school, with an emphasis on classical languages: Latin and Greek.  I decided to take the so-called the realistic section, with a stronger emphasis on science, it was purely for boys, which in my case meant I had to change class. 

There was some kind of antisemitic mobbing, which was unexpected.  It was related to an archetypical image of the Jew as a peddler.  One wonders.  In those days there were even fewer Jews than there are now.  This wasn’t a public topic, so they must have heard this from their parents.  How could they have known what a Jew was like, or that I was Jewish?

They didn’t beat me up or anything.   When I approached them, they imitated submissive kind of behavior they imagined as being typical. This I found very offensive, because this had nothing to do with me. 

I remember a few of them participated.  There was one boy who sometimes was also sometimes laughed about, although he was not mobbed; he was from a religious Catholic family, and he had absolutely no intention of participating.  This is something one doesn’t forget.   He became a friend some time later.  The mobbings lasted for two or three weeks, and then my father went to talk to the Director, who stopped them.  He was also very Catholic, and it was somehow known that he had no Nazi sympathies.  He  had some academic career— I’d have to look that up, but he was decidedly anti-Nazi.  I don’t remember why it was known.

Of course there was something after this that remained on my part; I was maybe more careful in some way.   I mean these are small things.  One guy says nasty things, then others  laughing or trying not to laugh. . . well apparently it does matter in a lifetime. . 

I studied all the standard  subjects:  Geography, history, English, German.  I was an average student.  I mean I was never in any real danger, but I was an average student.  All of the scientific friends I met later at university had been excellent students.  I never was.  I was good at math, and at physics, and English and philosophy.  I was good at the things I was interested in.  I was not good at things that didn’t interest me.  I was the only Jewish student.   There was a time, when a boy whom I know, the son of one of my parents comrades, was in the same class, because maybe they changed apartments, but only for a short time.  We were living in the 4th district; the grammar school was in the 5th, on the border between the 4th and 5th , within walking distance.  It was a local high school.  

Session Two, recording One

May 5th, 2023

I am not really qualified in historical detail, but the Moscow Declaration was based on a conference in Moscow in 1943, between the allies and China, I think.  It concerned what was to happen after the war, including the punishment of war criminals, and there was a document concerning the fate of Austria.  That document referred to Austria, not as an accomplice, but as a victim of Nazism.  It’s not totally a lie, but it is certainly not totally true.  But it was used as an excuse by many Austrian governments, to exculpate Austria from evil deeds, although that has changed in the past 20 or 30 years.  That (perspective) played an important role in postwar Austrian history. 

It also played a role directly for my parents.  Their Young Austria refugee group was run by communists, it was mostly Jewish and some also some political refugees.  When my parents first met, they would never have thought of returning to Austria.  My grandmother who survived the concentration camp—her expectation had been that my mother would bring her to England, which obviously she didn’t do.

The idea of returning to Austria was based on this Moscow Declaration—the idea of recreating an independent Austria. It was the duty of communists to return and help build up socialism.  I don’t know whether there was a direct order from Moscow, but this played a role.  My parents and their friends took  this is as a clear order that they should return to Austria, although later in life occasionally my father was occasionally unhappy with his professional life, which was rare, and my parents sometimes said that perhaps they should not have returned.  My mother who had seen things here before the Kinder Transport, said that she was ambivalent about coming back. They never acquired British citizenship.  My father’s mother got it a few years later.  

Why didn’t she (my paternal grandmother) come back?.  Why should she have?   It is coming back that cries for an explanation, not remaining.  My grandmother always spoke English with a very Austrian accent.  My parents would have had found it easier to integrate into English society.  

What would my life have been like had my parents remained in England?  There was one interesting experience I had in this connection.  In the late 1980’s, after my paternal grandmother’s husband had died—he died after his wife–I went to England to dissolve the household.  On the way back, sitting behind me was an old gentleman with his children.  He spoke English with a clear Viennese accent whereas the two children, probably students at the time, were very British.  They came to Vienna for a similar reason.   A family member had died and they had inherited a big house in the 13th district.  He had immigrated not to England but to Scotland, and the children were asking about family in Austria. 

It is unclear of course.  The education system in England in those days was not as open as in Austria.  If I had studied at say Cambridge, maybe things would have even been better, but they could also have been significantly worse.  These are speculative questions.  

My paternal grandmother remarried, also an Austrian,  whose family background was German speaking Czech Jews.  He could also speak Czech, as did my maternal grandmother.  When they visited he spoke Czech with my maternal grandmother.  My paternal grandmother was widowed in the 1930’s before she emigrated with my father.  She had had a boyfriend in Vienna, which wasn’t much talked about, he was apparently a wealthy man, who wanted to marry her.  He ended up in the US, via England.   He wanted her to marry him, but she had gotten to know this man, Eric Guttman, who had no money, and from the point of view of my then family, little to recommend him.  But she adored him and married him, and although he didn’t always treat her very nicely, they had I think a happy and successful marriage.  

Eric Guttman, Omama’s second husband, the aircraft engineer (1956)

She never worked except in the first years of the emigration when she was a housemaid for families.  He was first in the Czech part of the British army, spent some time in India, and then worked for Vickers, a British aircraft firm.  He was an engineer and he had gone to a Viennese grammar school where he had acquired most of his engineering skills.  He was an engineer in the aeronautical field.  My grandmother was clearly not communist, although they didn’t have great arguments about it with my parents.  Nor was my maternal grandmother.  She was liberated by the Red Army, but that played no role.   She wasn’t very political nor very educated.  (She was social democratic, but not communist.)

My maternal grandmother’s family had been here for two generations.  They spoke Czech as a second language-they had links.  Neither my mother nor her brother spoke Czech.  I’m not sure whether my grandmother’s brothers spoke Czech. 

Session 2, recording two

May 5, 2023

In the first Austrian government, there were communists in the Parliament, even an Austrian communist minister of education.  But the communists never made it in any subsequent election. There was hope that this would happen.  The party was organized into sections, for different districts.  There was one place  for meetings in the 4th district, where we lived, occasionally they would have meetings there.  I don’t know what was discussed.  But I do remember the May Day celebrations, where there were marches through different places in Vienna,  towards Parliament.   We would gather at the district meeting place, and be given flags and sing certain songs and march and so on.  This is a nice memory.  They would organize us children; it was a happy thing.  There were sausages, etc.  There would have been the standard pictures on the wall of Marx and Engels, Lenin and Stalin.  There was a communist belief that was passed on to me, and which I defended later in grammar school.  It had been passed onto me in an explicit way, but also implicitly. 

We went someplace once, on a weekend excursion, when I was small.  There was a beggar.   

I asked my parents to give him some money.   We were not rich in those days, but we had some money.  My parents were very negative, the reason they were negative, was of course that poverty is evil, but the way to avoid is by state intervention not by private gifts.  I don’t know precisely what they said, but this was my first political lesson.  This is still true.  Even social democrats now don’t believe that the future of mankind can be solved by private charity.  But my parents were not fanatic, so they gave the man some money, to keep me quiet.  Maybe this is something that I just happen to remember, but it is typical of how beliefs are passed on. 

My parents were not highly educated; my mother of course never went to high school; my father didn’t finish.  They were reasonably smart people but not intellectuals spending time thinking about theory.   The general mood in Austria those days was strongly anti-communist for very good reasons and the not-so-good reason that that had been part of Nazi propaganda—telling them what would happen if the Russians won the war.  And there were rapes and things.  These things were discussed at home, but there was denial of persecution in the Soviet Union—although that (position) became more difficult over time.   

But coming back to earlier times, in school I learned there was democracy (and there was dictatorship), and in democracies the freedom to vote, and I found that pretty convincing.  So I said this to my parents.   My father would answer that in a capitalist society, yes, you are free to die of hunger, whereas in a socialist society (a stage before communism, the ultimate paradigm) the state takes care of you. . he would say things like that to me. 

This came with decreasing certainty . . .  My father from the late 1950’s worked for an insurance firm.  He sold policies and so he had customers or people he wanted to turn into customers.  He got to know people who weren’t communists.  Occasionally those people would visit us at home.  That was a time where the books, the Stalin and Lenin books in our library, would be moved to the second row.  

This was typical for this whole group. . . In 1956, there was the invasion of Hungary—there were all of these refugees, most didn’t stay.  Clearly caused by not a friendly invasion, this was the first blow to the belief that the Soviet Union was a peaceful and well-meaning nation, to the other countries in the Soviet block.  Like most of their friends, they swallowed this, but then the final blow, for most of these people, was 11 years later, in 1968, the invasion of Czechoslovakia.  That was too much for them.  My parents like most of their friends, left the party.  But it was also a time by which my father had a good income, and that had changed his outlook.  My mother didn’t work at this point.  The party was a connecting link.  People were still bound together—you might have a hard time leaving the party before 1956, but not in 1968. 

In terms of prestige, a general manager of the biggest bank in Austria (his father’s father), was something different from being an insurance agent. Being an agent,  you have to  be nice to people in order to sell something.  When I heard my father speaking on the phone, I disliked this very much.  It helped me to know what I did not want to be.   When I first saw the play ‘Death of a Salesman’ by Arthur Miller, I saw a piece of my father,  I knew that I did not want to be a salesman.  

Interest in science.  This example of what I did not want to do played some role.  My interest in sciences in  general just happened, like a flash of insight, maybe similar to religion;  it happened when I was 15.  This idea that mathematics can be used to describe nature was something wonderful.  I knew immediately this was something I wanted to do. I read popular books about  the theory of relativity.  Relativity is a theory of physics which has elements of mathematical and also some philosophical relationships.  Those things interested me immensely.  When I was 15 or 16, I said to myself, not only did I want to do  physics but also relativity, and this is what I ended up doing. 

There is general relativity.  The special theory of relativity is a theory of space-time, which replaces classical concepts of physics that had been around since Galileo.  It’s a framework more than a theory governing the universe.  I didn’t have anyone in those days to talk to about my interests.  I happened to have from the 6th form, when I was 15, a new physics teacher.  He said a few things that immediately struck me, and from there I went off by myself.  We spoke a few times, but I followed up by reading popular books on my own.  Today we talk about people being supported and guided, but often with such things–the right person is confronted with new ideas and becomes a self-runner, as one says in German.

I learned from my good students … I never thought that I taught them a lot. Of course I taught them, but this triggered some kind of dynamic in them, and then they ran on their own.  One of the wonderful things about science is that there is progress, this is not obvious in the social sciences.  There is a famous book by C.P.Snow on the  ‘Two Cultures’.  The romantics and the scientists.  Of course I was on the side of the scientists.  

Later at University, that viewpoint was challenged.  1967, that was the time of the student revolution: Berkeley and Paris and Berlin.  There was some of it in Vienna.  Many children from communist families took part in this, and so did I to some degree.  In those days there was some something like a contempt for the sciences in those circles.  Maybe also because of Marcuse, who was one of the heroes of this movement.  Obviously science can be used for evil and for good things.  There is atomic, nuclear weapons in physics. Generally there was contempt for a field that lends itself to any causes whatsoever.  And so I also–I knew many of these leftist students–but I didn’t devote a lot of time to political work, I was more interested in the physics and the mathematics. 

Session 2, recording 3

Friday, May 5, 2023

I got interested in physics and mathematics at the age of roughly 15.  It was clear to me that it was something that I would want to do.  I didn’t know whether I was cut out to do this; I hoped I had the talent, but it was certainly something I wanted to do.  It was clear that I would study physics. There is a year between completion of high school and the start university, when I had to serve in the Austrian army, which was obligatory in those days.  I could talk about those years, but they don’t fit into what we are talking about now.  Those 9 months in the Austrian army  were useless in terms of what such service were intended to be, governed by silly commands, a waste of time. But this in turn was also useful.  After these months, I was hungry for intellectual things.  University study is not necessarily all fun, but having missed study for an extended period, I was ready to accept it and try to get over that.  

The question was where I would study.  Living in Vienna, it was for me obvious that I would study at the Vienna University.  Within Austria, people who lived in a city with a university, went to the university in their city.  For my parents, it was something remarkable for my father that I would go to university and be supported while I went to University.  There were no fees then.  My grandparents in England suggested that I try to get into Cambridge.  I don’t know how easy that would have been, but that would have meant significant fees, which my parents, my father, were not prepared to pay.  Maybe if I had been determined, and this had been a great place for physics, I might have tried, but somehow that was beyond my thinking.  The answer is that I did not see any choice.  

Also one should mention that the university system in continental Europe is still quite different from the United States, and it was even more different in those days.  When one studied at the University of Vienna, in the philosophical faculty, one had a primary and a secondary subject, and the only way to complete it was to do a Phd.  You had to go all the way to the PhD.  

Now, for some 28-30 years, in all of Europe, with some exceptions there is a BA.   In the sciences, nearly all go for the masters.  Now the Phd is the exception, for those who will remain in academia.  In the biggest firms, at the highest grade, there were also Phds. In those days it was slightly different in the technical universities, where you ended with an engineering degree equivalent to as master and a Phd was the exception, but that also was an extended study of 5+ years.  If you became say a physics teacher, you wouldn’t do the Phd, but something else.  Nevertheless, in the biggest firms, at the highest grade, there were Phds.  

I thought my Phd should be in physics; I thought of physics as superior to mathematics because in physics mathematics is not used for its own sake, but to describe nature and make predictions. Today I would choose to become a mathematician.   I think I  turned out to be a better mathematician.  As a child, I had a fairly good understanding of physics, but then I was exposed to some bad teaching at the University.  I then decided on physics—mathematics and physics have made tremendous progress in the past 10 to 15 years—there have been Nobel Prizes in subjects that are fairly close to my interests.  But today our everyday life is filled with mathematics, and I find this interesting. 

(In the 1960’s) there was some kind of standard curriculum in physics, which has been streamlined.  One had to study mathematics and also do some lab work, the latter of which I disliked and was not very good at.  

Bobby, 1969

I spent my whole professional life in universities, mostly at Vienna University.  There is this general admiration in academia of professors, but I was never really affected.  I was never very proud of being a member of the University, nor did I have a great respect for many of the professors.  I rather judged them—at first I just listened to things, and then I tried to do things myself.  Then one compares oneself. . the longer I did this, the more I judged them by their work and less by their statements and presentation.  (I was not always impressed by their work.)   

Universities at the time were very old fashioned, there was the figure of the professor, who was important by virtue of presenting certain courses—just being himself–and this is not possible now.  Some people in the system never had any doubt that they should be anything else.  But I didn’t come from this kind of family, and I always asked myself if I was good enough.

Study at an Austrian or German universities in those days was a very individual thing, very different from a US undergraduate study in those days, which was more similar to the last two years of an Austrian high school.  Here there was a big gap between high school and university.  There was a core curriculum, and then one was left to one’s own devices.  In principle you could have gone for a Phd in 4 or 5 years, but very few actually did.   Basically you approached an institute or a person and asked him or her to propose a topic for your Phd. 

My natural anchor was the Institute for Theoretical Physics.  There was a test, after 4-5 years, to determine if you were suitable for the Phd.; that was quite a barrier.  You spent those years doing course work, (and only then did you take this test.)  You were more or less expected to discover by yourself if this was suitable for you.  Of course there were exams along the way. And then there was this one exam, which was for permission to do a degree in theoretical physics.  You had to solve exercises, all in a field that wasn’t really my field of interest. 

My doctor father (mentor), shortly after having given me my PhD topic, left the field, so then again I was completely on my own.  Of course you write it up and present it , and then you have to pass, but it took me more than two years to do this.  He gave me a problem which had arisen from a conversation of his with Richard Feynman in the United States, one of the great masters of theoretical physics.   So he passed this idea on to me, but he gave me no tools to approach it.  It was just a thought.  So I had to slightly change the topic into something feasible, and I did this on my own.  I had desk in a room, which still exists, the Schrödinger room.  Schrödinger had been the last Austrian Nobel prize winner in physics, until Anton Zeilinger in 2022.  There was a room bearing his name.  This belonged to the library—there were all these books.  I was sitting there with nothing to do, so I took one of those volumes, and found articles, by people related to Einstein, articles that were loosely related to my Phd.  From them, I found something that I could do and moved forward.  

Session 3, recording 1 

Friday, May 12, 2023

Maybe we could come back to as early as my school years.  Clearly I stuck out somehow from my schoolmates, more because of my political background than from my Jewish background. 

That turned out to be an important lesson for me—I shared the views of my parents, although I already then found some things hard to believe.  This was Austria in the late 50’s and early 60’s.  Communism was badly viewed–the Iron Curtain, the Hungarian revolution.  People were afraid of the Soviets, but I followed my parents and defended them in discussions in places. . . To me in retrospect, of course, the viewpoint of the teachers and other pupils were right.  I was wrong.  Still, it was good to learn to speak up for one’s opinion.  On the other hand, trying to be courageous in the sense of defending a minority opinion, does not mean that one was right. 

The Social Democrats, in the very old days, had had a strong Marxist background. This was an argument by the conservatives against them in elections.  This was posed as a threat.  They couldn’t shake this off.  Finally  Kreisky managed to do this —he came from a bourgeois background.   Claiming that the social democrats were communists didn’t any longer work.  

Austria as always had a center-right majority, most of whom are Catholics. In the Nazi period ties with the Catholic church were weakened. After the war many became super catholic again.  That was one of several reasons the atmosphere after the war was both politically and culturally very conservative.

Coming back to myself. Being in a minority position does not make you right.  I spent 9 months in the Austrian army for my military experience.  By that time I had turned into a pacifist–which is not really what communists are—again I was in a minority situation.  It turns out I registered for 12 months, instead of 9 months, because my father had a customer who advised that I would be better off so I could do something more—I was somehow in a section of the army that was more elite (i.e. people with a high school degree).  

At some stage we were required to write an essay about Austria’s military defense, over Christmas at home.   Of course they wanted us to express the official view. I decided to write an essay expressing my own (pacifist) view. In fact, I wrote Austria should be completely disarmed.  What then happened I had discussions with officers.  To them I was dangerous.  After these many years, my viewpoint has changed completely.   Now I live in a society where young people don’t have to do this military service, they can do social service.  Now I believe that Austria needs a strong army, at least within Europe.  So it seems to be that my opinions are always in the wrong place or at the wrong time. 

The apparently naïve points of view, of which my superiors in the army wanted to persuade us: e.g. there being a natural right to defend oneself (‘Imagine if you are together with your girlfriend and someone attacks her what do you do?’).  Now I actually believe these views are justified  (think of Ukraine). 

First of all, as far as my family was concerned, Austria was part of their political creed.  They considered themselves Austrian patriots, like the resistance fighters.  There is one brand of Austrian patriotism, that is related to the foundation of postwar Austria by people who had been in the camps or the resistance.  This is the framework for people like my parents.  But the widespread view is that there was not much patriotism before Kreisky.   Much of this patriotism consists of not being German—this is at least 50% of it.  ‘Germans have no humor.  They are more bellicose than us; they have a sense of order that is too much.  

As for myself I consider myself an Austrian patriot. Some people, with a background similar to mine, are much more critical of Austria than I.  But under different circumstances I might have turned out differently—I might have been a proud Englishman.   

Kreisky opened Austria to the world.   He welcomed Arafat.  Abortion became legal in the Kreisky years.  Louise is from a more conservative background—she may have voted for him once because of abortion, but she is strongly opposed to a policy of excessive government spending which started under Kreisky.

I started out as a leftist, but I ended up as something more of a conservative.  There is no conservative party in the good sense.  Not really the OEVP, but I voted for them on certain occasions, even when I knew they would make a coalition with the Freedom Party, which is impossible for me to vote for directly. 

From its origins the Freedom Party is a Nazi party—it is a right wing populist party, attractive to people who don’t want to try hard.  They are happy to have social security but they are jealous of other people.  They ended up fishing in the same pool as the Social Democrats. 

I am in principle willing to vote for any party—other than the Freedom Party.  But I became dissatisfied with the leftists, which is why I vote for the conservatives.  But calling myself a conservative is too much.   The left as I see it has turned hypocritical, a better term is dishonest.   

I agree with our general social democratic structure.  There is a general consensus about this. 

There are some things in left wing ideology which are not common sense.  Things are never your fault, they are the fault of society.

The Freedom Party is not opposed to a policy of strong government intervention in the economy.  This fact is often ignored.  National Socialism was also socialism of some kind.  One of the big scandals was when Haider was governor of Carinthia.  He was accused of Nazi sympathies.  At some point he said the Nazis had had a good employment policy.  This caused an uproar, and this caused his resignation as governor.  But this had some truth.   They built up the army and they stole from the Jews, but they had some kind of social democratic policy.  There are connections and similarities between the outer left and the outer right.  

Session 4, recording 1

February 5, 2024.   

Larry:  Bobby and I had three previous conversations and we are having our last conversation for this purpose today.   We would like to talk with Bobby about his career and his life as a father of two children.  We are also sitting in Bobby’s apartment eating wonderful cake made by Louise and having coffee—I’m in something better than a Vienna coffee house because Louise’s cake is better than in most coffee houses.  Let’s talk about your professional post-doctoral career and how you ended up teaching and the kind of work you did as a scientist.

I studied at Vienna University, which ended in 1974;  a year later I married, a catholic woman, Elizabeth, whom I had met in the midst of the leftist students movement.  She was part of that; I was part of that naturally because of my background; in Vienna it was not as big as its German analog.   Many  of the people participating were like myself, people from a leftist or even communist family background—so many were Jewish youngsters from a communist background.   My wife is from a Catholic background in Styria, so her family was by no means leftist.  

my parents with my wife and me

But as to the professional thing, I remained at Vienna University.  I got what would be called in the United States an assistant professorship;  I continued what I had been doing in my Phd plus some teaching. It was then called Universitätsassistent.   I must say I sometimes feel a bit to my shame that most of my career was at Vienna University.  In that sense most of my career was quite linear.  Physics and mathematical physics are of course  highly international disciplines—I had extended stays at Oxford and Cambridge and in the US, for reasons of research or scientific collaboration or giving lectures, but except for a whole year at Oxford, I was always based in Vienna.  In terms of the subject on which I worked, I was educated as a physicist, but there is of course, the way that mathematics is being used, there is a whole spectrum of possibilities.  At Oxford in 1977 I was at the department of astrophysics.  My field in physics gravity and relativity has a close relationship to these things.  But I disliked getting more physical and close to observations, so I became more mathematical. 

Physics is the study of the basic laws of nature.  This concerns all non-living things, but in principle also organic things, if one is as I am, a reductionist, then practically everything, including living things and the brain, all come down to physics in the end, even if carrying that out is a project for the future.  The phenomenon of conscience for example is a problem for biologists and philosophers, but for us it comes down to physics.  What makes it physics is the way these laws are described, namely that they are described in the language of mathematics.   Physics finds these laws and making predictions from them, and comparing with observation.  There is a spectrum, how mathematical one wants to get.  My field is general relativity, this is very mathematical, and it has turned out, particularly in recent decades, that predictions made on purely mathematical analysis have been vindicated by experiments.  The primary example of this is black holes, which are mathematical predictions, there is now huge experimental evidence of their existence.  I ended up being a bit more of a mathematician than a physicist. 

The movement of the planets, where physics started by Galileo and Newton, radiation, etc., all studied by astronomers and astrophysicists—this is not what I’m really good at.  I like to concentrate on small things.  Within mathematics, one has some clear assumptions, one starts with everything on a piece of paper, focusing on a problem. 

Of course for reasons I’ve just mentioned, it’s not something that is very closely related to experiment, but the first real problem I tackled, 2-3 years after my Phd was something like the following.  If you think of a heavy body like the earth, and it’s gravitational field, and you look at it from a large distance, it is rotationally symmetric.   As you move closer, you see more details of the shape of this body, and you look at it order by order, with more structure.  There is a way to describe this field by certain quantities, called multipole moments.  There are more of them as you move closer.  There was a question as to whether these multipole moments allow you to reconstruct the gravitational field that these moments create.   Together with a younger colleague, I was able to solve this problem.  This was one of my first successes.  

Astrophysics is its own discipline, derived from a number of theories, but too complex  to be mathematically rigorous.

I work from problem to problem.  In most cases, it was a logical thing.  I moved from one to the next.  Every solution gives rise to new questions. Of course there were changes.  One relatively drastic change, happened in about 2000, exactly the time of the breakup of my marriage   ( I married in 1975.)   I worked with  Bernd Schmidt, with whom I had already collaborated before. He was German.  He proposed to me the field of continuum mechanics, bodies have elastic properties, they are not merely points.  He posed this issue to me.  That for me was a wonderful experience, personally and as a scientist.  When my marriage broke up, since it was I who had left, I had a bad conscience, and everyone had known me as a family man.  I was worried about retrieving my humanity, and it helped to have friends who still thought of you as a friend, even under changed circumstances.  I had to some degree to recreate myself.  This new subject was very different from what I had been doing before.  I had always been concerned with the vacuum.  There can be gravitational fields without bodies. In principle, the world could exist without bodies, but lots of interesting things could still be going on.  For example a gravitational wave: In principle to understand these things, you can imagine them as something, not created by matter, but freely propagating in space.  We know that the universe started in a big bang.  There can, in principle, be different kinds of radiation, that were there from the beginning.  There is a class of differential equations that describe waves, a wave of particles, or electromagnetic waves, without particles, just waves in vacuum.  A lot of things can be done in my field by ignoring matter.  It was a big change for me, in 2000, to now start to think about matter.  The theory I worked on with Bernd, was elasticity, elastic bodies.  We started developing tools.  This was my main interest for 20 years, a bit less since Bernd died a year ago.  We worked on this together for almost 25 years.  He had been a scientist at an astrophysics institute in southern Germany, then in Potsdam, and then lived his last years in Munich. 

This is not the highest profile field.  It is a bit of a fringe subject, but I think it was a success.  I think we were able to do things that have some lasting value.  That has been my main focus, trying to produce some things that have usefulness over time. 

Session 4, recording 2

February 25, 2024

Bobby was telling me about the re-orientation of his work after he began working with his colleague Bernd. 

I want to spend a few minutes talking about friendship as I experienced it in connection with scientific collaboration. I have always had very few friends, almost all of them were colleagues.  Not all of them; Larry is a recent acquisition as a friend.   Science of course is not only collaborative, it is also competitive.  There can be friendship but also enormous competition and hate.  There are fields where people are so eager for success that they might even steal their colleagues ideas.  In my field I was lucky that this rarely happened.  I had situations like that, but mostly I found there was friendly collaboration and a positive attitude towards what other people are doing. In a collaboration one is interested together in solving some scientific problem, and there is the personal side.  One is invited to dinner and gets to know each other’s family.  But mostly one does not talk too much about those things.  Nonetheless this is a way to get to know each other very well, maybe even better than from discussing one’s private life. 

When you work on a problem, there are several things that you have to learn, for example.  

The two people are not good at the same things.  There are things where I can rely on the other person more than on myself, and the converse.  For that reason every collaboration is different because of the different capabilities. Also there are emotions which are not reflected in the end product but which play a role in pursuing the subject.  Most of the people with whom I collaborated, I think I knew them very well, and they knew me very well.  

It had been a deficiency in my marriage that we had very few friends whom we would meet on a regular basis.  So there was much focus inwards rather than outwards.  For example, when I left the maternal (marital) apartment, I stayed in my mother’s place for a few weeks.  For many weeks I received no phone calls, after we split up.  Of course I had meetings with my children and things to discuss with my ex-wife, but there was no one around to miss me.  But this was made up for in my professional life. 

In the previous recording I mentioned a change of field in connection with the breakup of my marriage.  Bernd suggested the topic.  Of course there would have been many things in a different setting—people might have asked what happened or how I was feeling.  But this was not done.  What Bernd gave me was something to work on.  In addition to this area having been of interest to him for a long time, he knew exactly what was needed for me.  The other thing; it was good; they (Bernd and his wife)  had known my family and my wife, and they welcomed Louise.  They had in those days a wonderful house in Werder near Potsdam, and we visited them. I spent extended periods at the Max-Planck institute there working on this new project.  Louise who was still married in those days was here (in Vienna).  They did not have initial reservations; they could have viewed her as the culprit.  They didn’t, and that was something wonderful that they did for me and for us,  I might say.  

Louise and me (2012?)

Maybe this is neither here nor there, there is something funny about the breakup of a marriage in my experience, which is just an observation that I find interesting: how this is viewed by people outside.  It is a bit as if marriage is an important institution in bourgeois life.   When a marriage breaks up, when people think of it has having been a happy marriage, it’s as if the universe holds its breath for a moment.  Of course there are women, wives of friends, who get worried, who might find that I might be an example for their husbands, so they tend to be a bit skeptical, but also men suddenly say things about their own life which they hadn’t said before and a few weeks later they wouldn’t repeat.  It’s a bit like a moment of truth, happily forgotten. 

Session 4, recording 3    

My children. 

My son’s wife has two practically-grown children whom my son thinks of as his step children.  My daughter has a girl and a boy.  Maybe I could start out by saying something in principle about the experience of birth, from my personal perspective.  I always wanted to have children, so I did.  The advent of a child was something I experienced in a special way, although I received no religious education.  The experience of a child being born—the idea of the Messiah is something which I can relate to in connection with the birth of a child.  In the Christian tradition, this is also very clear and strangely as it may sound, it has some connection with science.  Science goes on and on, knowledge and open problems are also passed on.  When a child is born, one doesn’t know what it will be, it’s specific strengths and weaknesses.  Being born as a human being, the life of this little human being; it will be tested by life, but it’s also that the world is to some degree tested by the new child.  The child can look at the world in a new way, in different unforeseen ways, I mean I’m not necessarily thinking about saving the world, but it could make contributions to mankind, and it could solve problems, and it will be critical of the world.  Particularly young people are always critical about society and their parents.  All these are a test on both sides, so in a scientific experiment, something similar takes place.  

This is a feeling I had when my children were born, particularly when my son was born, this was my first experience.  People told me, at the time that my children were born, that I appeared them somehow different, elated.  I didn’t notice myself, but if that was the case, it was due to feelings like that.  This is why I think it important to have children, it is important to one’s growth as a human being.  Of course there is again in the world of science something similar in dealing with the next generation, with younger colleagues, collaborating with them or seeing the progress they make has been part of the joy in professional life. 

Front: my children left to right rear: Rosangela (piano teacher from Brazil), my mother-in-law, mother, aunt Julie (1st cousin of maternal grandmother), me, my wife (1985?)

As far as my own children are concerned . . .  when I try to describe them, the first thing is that they are very different from one another.   With a background such as mine, knowing what happened during the Holocaust, I sometimes looked at my children and imagined (sick) that something might happen to them.  (Larry interjects:  You’re not the only one who was raised that way.)  I imagined, supposed, the most terrible thought that they would be deported somewhere.  What would happen and how would they react?   This is a terrible thought experiment but it says how I see the differences between them. 

my children

(Note added: I should rather say the following is how I thought of their difference when they were little – perhaps not when I think of them as the adult persons they are now.)  

If this happened to my son, he would pretend to be dead, to somehow find his way or be forgotten. He would have worse chances to escape in an early stage, but if things get worse and worse, because of his way of somehow pretending to be dead he might be overlooked, but stand a good chance of surviving.  My daughter would behave differently–she would create hell to people, maybe they would let her run way, just to get rid of her.  Maybe if that didn’t work, she would have a worse chance than he to survive.  So this is how I saw the difference between my children. It’s a sick picture; it is something which . . . (Larry: you are describing their personalities in the context of your fear.)

Bobby written notes after the interview:  

Despite their differences in temperament and sometimes different opinions, there are things my children have in common. They are both very intelligent. Equally important: they have independent yet open minds. Families with a Jewish-leftist backgrounds tend to have children – if they have any – echoing their parents’ beliefs. They would typically vote for the Greens and be critical of all forms of patriotism, in particular concerning Austria.  My children, on the    contrary have ‘come a long way’ from where I – and to some degree their mother – stood when I was young. They know of course where they come from. The present document is an attempt to make sure this extends to my grandchildren.

Session 5, new recording

May 26, 2024

This is Larry Sicular sitting in my apartment in Vienna talking with my friend Bobby Beig. 

We are now going to record a last session of his oral history and today’s session is about his family life.  

So, Bobby, we talked about your work, so perhaps you can talk a bit about what you did outside of work. 

So well, I must say, I was never a person, although my work was certainly of great interest to me, and I worked a lot at home on and off, my family also meant a lot to me too, particularly in the growing up of my children.  Also we had colleagues over for dinner, and either they (the children) would listen quietly or take part in the conversation, and what was important to me always was their intellectual development.  I wasn’t so aware of that at the time.  Now that I’m seeing my granddaughter and also my grandson and watching them grow up and listening to the things they say, I am much more aware of this, how interesting it is, what goes on in a child’s mind, and how it expresses it in words.  That is another thing, that concerns my own development.  I never did well at German, but language means a lot to me, even in a scientific context.  Perhaps this will change with AI, but mathematics, as it has been done for centuries, requires language.  I care about language, about clarity in language, and it is something one sees very rarely, and I certainly hoped my children would grow up as persons who try to think hard about certain things and try to express them in a clear fashion.  And that was the most important thing to me.  And I must say, despite their differences, it is something that has worked out wonderfully.  So they are different in many ways.  My son is more gentle in some ways, more understanding.  My daughter can be quite tough, but they both know what it takes to form an opinion and express it in a clear fashion. In writing a text, on politics, science, it is hard to say something both clear and correct.  There are very few ways to say something that is right, correct and relevant.  To be aware of that is very important.  And it is something that I have seen both my children being very good at, in different ways. 

My son now has for most of his life worked as a journalist, so he has to write about things.  When I read things he writes, not always, many times I agree with him, and I also like his style of writing, the way he does write.  This despite the fact that in his political creed he moved—well I did move to the right too—but he more so than I.  But it never goes to the point that he writes in a fanatic or irrational way.  So, yes, he also has a musical talent.  He wrote music; he has training as a composer.  What I have seen when he grew up, was a certain talent that might have cut him out for being a film director, or at least a composer of film music, which didn’t happen for several reasons—Austria is not the right place for such a career—but it is something that I hope.  He has written pieces of music, waltzes; he wrote during the lockdown.  Nothing career wise came out of this, but maybe that could still happen when at some point he retires from his job.  My daughter is a lawyer, but she spent several years at university, not just for the study.  She has written original papers on legal issues which entered books and things and in one case (was) cited by the Supreme Court.  Her training as a lawyer isn’t quite complete yet due to interruptions, such as the children and so on.  But she’s as a lawyer not just a standard lawyer, so she can in principle deal with difficult cases, WITH things that are not a routine job, but which require somebody who understands things from scratch, so to speak, and she is able to do that.  She is fast (at) understanding things and she is able to function under pressure. So I think about strengths in my children and things which I respect and which give me a sense of pride, also because I think that it has to do with them, but also a little bit with the way they grew up. 

How did you and your wife manage things so that they learned these skills?

You don’t learn this, even in science.  The most important things are not the lines but what is between the lines, so for example, one has a discussion about any issue, and then listens to another person.  And then this awareness when a point comes, perhaps a hidden assumption that you have to point out.  So it is this kind of awareness which requires intelligence and growing up in an environment where this is valued.  I think children don’t learn these things directly, but they acquire a sense that this is important, and more importantly they find that they are good at it, and then of course, they further develop it.  

Posted in Commentary, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Italy, Florence

I’m in Italy, not the first time.  My first visit was in 1961, returning to California after a year in India.  My mother took us to Europe, organizing stops in Rome, Florence, Venice, then a train to Lugano, Vienna, Salzburg, and some weeks at a lake in the Austrian Alps where my father joined us. 

I vaguely remember a pensione in Rome, somewhat larger and more elegant than the places I choose now, dinner outdoors in a plaza,  its souvenir, a painted ceramic ashtray, later looking up at Michelangelo’s David in Florence.  There were other trips, again to Venice in the 1970’s,  a concert and the frescoed ceiling at its Scuola Grande di San Rocco, in Rome in the 80’s or 90’s reading I Claudius, the Robert Graves novel.  About twenty years ago, my sister invited me to join her family at a rented house near Orvieto. Then last year I  was in Merano and Milan with close friends.

The earlier memories faded.  Now they are feelings or images, rather than precise elements.  In Rome, it’s the violence in the novel, in Venice hand held mirrors for the ceiling frescoes at San Rocco; in Milan it was my friend Scot, guiding us to the entrances of a number of beautiful post World War II apartment houses.  There is a pastry shop in central Milan where the beauty of the shop was even more memorable than the taste of the pastry. 

In my room in Florence there is a blood red orange on the desk, a cup and saucer with dark tea and lots of lemon juice.  There are large double doors, overlooking the hotel terrace, the Arno river and Brunelleschi’s dome. It is egg-shaped, tiled and ribbed, large on its base from close up, smaller from my room, ethereal.  I admire it from the bed, lit up at night or colored by early morning daylight.  I will be sorry to leave it tomorrow.   

the view from my room in Florence

Italy has more man-made beauty than any other place on earth, so it seems.  It is the talent for composition in painting and architecture, the skill in layering detail without excess or weight. It is the the streetscapes, the store fronts, the sense of age, the combination of these things, so beautiful despite many other tourists.  There is so much of it, seemingly around every corner.  Jaded by my own age, not easily impressed, constantly and for years exposed to beautiful things, I am awed like a child, as though seeing beauty for the first time.   The superiority of it takes my breath away.  If only I can describe it, understand it,  remember it, so here I’ll try, for two of the most beautiful things. 

David

There was a crowd outside the Accademia Museum in Florence;  but the Florentines kept the crowds waiting outside; once inside it was merely busy.  It was easy to find the David and a corner chair, to stand and walk around him, then sit again.  He is the most beautiful object I have ever seen, muscular without distortion, yet with enlarged and powerful hands and feet. His gaze is elevated to his task, the pending battle, the relaxed pose of a man who effectively uses his body, still a “youth” as described in the Torah, the youngest of Jesse’s sons, when the prophet Samuel finds him in Bethlehem, “. . . ruddy, and withal of beautiful eyes, and goodly to look upon.”  Michelangelo portrays him as a young man, retaining the beardlessness and smooth, slim-muscled elegance of youth, a kind of ideal, a symbol of history, of masculinity, yet a sensual object.  I was awed by this portrayal of a Jew by a Christian sculptor creating what he admired and presumably what he desired.  Its beauty and masculinity speak from the flesh of the stone, as much as from that of a living man. 

The gallery and the Uffizi

I do not mean the entire museum but the three-sided passage on its top floor that the Medicis used to display art.  Knowing nothing, I “discovered” it at the top of a stairway at the start of the exhibition.  I had never seen museum architecture like this.  It  is strong and impressive, yet like so much in Italy, it is layered and ornamented and so seems to say many things.   It is grand, on a large scale, wide with high ceilings, unexpectedly long, accentuated by beams separated by shallow, delicately frescoed, vaults.  There are huge framed windows on one or both sides, letting in incredible light, with views of the Arno and the surrounding city, reinforcing their intimacy.  For centuries the gallery has been used for display; there are probably hundreds of Roman statues and above them, portraits, in a secondary position, some hanging lower, some between the huge windows.  The statues may have been the initial focus, but they enhance and are strengthened by the gallery, so it is not the pieces, but the totality of the place that is the primary work of art.  The major paintings, including the Botticellis, are in a series of windowless side rooms opening from the gallery;  none of them fascinated me as much as this space. [1]

the gallery at the Uffizi

the gallery at the Uffizi

[1] The Uffizi was commissioned by Cosimo de Medici in about 1550 according to the Uffizi website; Georgio Vasari was the architect. The building was completed shortly after their deaths in 1574.  Vasari is even better known for his book Lives of the Artists, an early survey of the great artists of the Italian renaissance. According to Donald John Fricelli, in an unpublished dissertation (1984),  the gallery (Altana) was originally conceived as an open passageway but was glazed in 1574.  Again according to the Uffizi, Francesco I, son Cosimo, began adorning gallery with statues and art in the 1580’s. 

Posted in Commentary | 2 Comments

The War in Gaza

January 2024

I have feelings about this war—fear, horror, disappointment, but it has been harder to know what to think.  I read the newspapers, trying to make up for a lack of expertise and primary sources.   I want to have an opinion. 

Israel

History argues for a Jewish state, some place where Jews are not a hated minority, someplace to run when we are not accepted, a place where some of us can choose  to defend ourselves.

In the 20th century, defenselessness, our age-old strategy in Europe, was no longer workable.  The re-creation of Israel is more than a connection with our ancient history; it is a statement that Jews, at least some of us, are no longer willing to be passive.  Was any other solution possible?   Did western Europe or the United States save us?  Should we have chosen to disappear?  Israel became a necessity, and so it must survive. 

But I am not Palestinian.  It is not too difficult to understand that after hundreds, thousands of years, the Palestinians were less than enthusiastic about the return/immigration of large numbers of Jews, initially from Europe, the re-creation of a Hebrew society and the establishment of a new/revived, ethnic/religious state.  Whatever, the wisdom of their reaction, and many would argue that they have not been terribly wise—the Palestinians have steadily lost territory in a series of conflicts since 1948.  With more and more of them on less and less land, most Palestinians have been effectively pushed aside. 

Does this excuse terrorism or remove Israel’s right to defend itself?   It does not, and whether or not the reader agrees with that, it won’t stop Israel from doing so.  Israel exists, among other reasons, to defend its citizens and the Jewish people.  But in order to avoid a repeat of endless wars, Israelis, and all Jews, need be guided by an understanding that Israel’s foundations were not entirely pure and good.

Of course, there is plenty of blame to pass around. 

There was/is . . 

–the inevitability of  Zionism (European nationalism and antisemitism).

–the unwillingness of the United States and other countries to accept Jewish refugees prior to the Holocaust.

–the forced emigration of hundreds of thousands of Middle Eastern Jews to Israel after its foundation (and yet their “return” is no longer an issue)

–the unwillingness of the Arab states to effectively absorb their displaced co-religionists (unlike Israel)

–their unwillingness (until recently) and that of many Palestinians to accept a Jewish state in Israel, despite the arguable justification and, more importantly, the practical necessity of doing so.

–the unwillingness of Israel to effectively foster a separate Palestinian state, when it has had some ability to do so.  

The circumstances of the Palestinians is a problem that Israel should address, differently, since it is now the stronger party, since the Palestinians themselves are unable or unwilling to find a solution,  since the Arab states (and others) will not or cannot do so, and because Israel does not have the power to avoid doing so. 

The Palestinians were dispossessed through a combination of Jewish persistence and their own bad choices;  but there is legitimacy to Palestinian claims.  That does not mean that Israel should dissolve itself—the United States and Canada are not being returned to the American Indians, nor is any country in the Americas, nor will the Germans be permitted to repopulate the cities of Eastern Europe, nor will Islam willingly retreat to the Arabian peninsula and restore Christianity in Byzantium.  Nor is the inability of Palestinians to legitimize Israel the fundamental issue.  Rather, if Israel wants peace, if Jews wish to move beyond present circumstances, we might recognize that our history in Israel has not always been glorious. 

The alternative, the need to always be “right”,  is to continually repeat history, a series of wars, occupation and domination, even possibly genocide (ours or theirs).  All are terrible.   Jews have a self-designated role in the world, that of an enlightened and direct relationship with God.  That view might encourage us to think about solutions that reflect not only our will to survive, but also whom we want to be.   

The October 7 attack and the Israeli response

The October 7 attack was unspeakable; it was barbaric, and since it was an organized massacre of Jews, it was a pogrom.  It was conducted by people who consider themselves to be aggrieved, to be victims.  How else can they have possibly justified and celebrated cruelty?

It was also a major security lapse by the Israeli state, which controlled, or presumably controlled, the Gaza border. 

The Israeli reaction has been fierce, which may be a deterrent, but it has also been argued that it is disproportionate.  The number of subsequent deaths, estimated by Hamas at over 22,000, far exceeds the 1,200 Israelis murdered.  The circumstances of the Gazan deaths may be less barbaric, but only if one argues that death by bombing is less cruel than death and murder close up, by shooting,  by violation and by mutilation.  And this does not take into account the destruction of buildings and infrastructure. 

Israel’s government has decided to destroy Hamas and its military capabilities, even at  enormous cost.  But can Hamas itself, and the base of its support and revival really be destroyed?   Morality aside,  it might be feasible.  Destruction and death, enough of it, can end opposition.  But this assumes a long war, a lengthy occupation, re-education of the Palestinian population to a more moderate position—and a complete rebuilding of Gaza, its buildings and its economy.  This might be something like what the Allies did after beating and destroying Germany in World War II (as Netanyahu has said).  However, the Palestinians continue to have varying support in the surrounding Arab states, and there is substantial international sympathy for the justness of their position.  The Germans may also have had legitimate grievances, but the Nazis sacrificed them to an extreme agenda and were without support at the end of the Second World War. 

Can Israel afford this strategy?   It  would be extremely expensive.  Israel is not likely able or willing to pay for it.  US,  European and Arab participation in a rebuilding project may be inadequate.   Should the US pressure Israel to ease its destructive reaction?  The US government has not applied maximum pressure, at least in public, and in public, the Israeli prime minister has indicated that he will not yield to outside pressure.  

In these circumstances, there is uncertainty as to how much leverage the United States has and how dependent Israel is on US financial and arms support.  The United States may not have the power to insist; this war is viewed as existential in Israel.  Despite a virulent anti-Israel reaction on the left, it is not clear how much free-maneuver the US administration has, given substantial support for Israel in the United States. 

Even in these circumstances, the United States could have taken, and can still take, a more hands off position, supportive, but perhaps less willing to supply arms or additional funding for the very aggressive approach that Israel has chosen.  The administration has argued that it has more influence by working with the Israeli government within the context of overall support, and the Prime Minister’s public statements are already countered by this article in Haaretz, reporting that the US has calmed its demands for an early end to the war, in exchange for more aid and more protection of civilians.   https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2023-12-25/ty-article/.premium/biden-lets-israel-proceed-as-long-more-humanitarian-aid-enters-gaza/0000018c-9d79-ddc3-a1bf-bf7fa1f90000

The Israeli government  also had other choices.  The October 7 attack was an intelligence and military failure.  The border was not secured, so Israel’s first reaction might have been to secure it.  Hamas is deeply imbedded in Gaza, so its military structure and military support cannot be entirely destroyed, militarily, without killing much of the population.  Killing all Hamas supporters is not practical or moral.  Killing a  substantial minority of them, even if unintentional or regrettable, is killing nevertheless, and it does not seem to diminish civilian support among  Palestinians, indeed support for Hamas has risen on the West Bank.   

A friend in Vienna, who has some psychological training, attended a meeting with a professional psychologist who had visited Israel . . . his diagnosis was trauma.  Indeed Israel has been traumatized, and its reaction traumatic. 

A more limited reaction, a retaliation against the perpetrators or the leaders, more targeted strikes, together with better border defenses, might have been a short-term alternative to the goal of total eradication.  How to fight a more limited war is not my expertise; Hamas continues to launch rockets into Israel.  A military reaction was probably necessary, but a more strategic, even-if-long-term campaign might have been a better step to a longer term solution. 

A longer term solution for Israel

As we have read, the Israeli government’s (or Netanyahu’s)  previous strategy allowed for the funding of Hamas (by Qatar) and was supposed to have been a material disincentive for this attack.  That failed, although there are no easy solutions against an adversary that does not accept the basis for  Israel’s existence. 

Although it failed, the previous strategy did not require the agreement of Palestinians.  Negotiated solutions require agreements,  whereas strategies and shorter-term solutions can be pursued by one party or the other unilaterally.  Since a negotiated solution may be impossible at this point, it may be preferable to seek progress from a more flexible position.  But what is progress?   Certainly for the Israelis, the first priority is to ensure against further attacks from rockets and from invasions.   That is no easy taske, but next priority should be peace.  How can it best do this?

Hamas funding

A first might be to defang Hamas, even if it cannot be entirely eliminated.  And the least painful way to disable it may be to go after its money.  This was addressed  in an opinion piece by Yair Lapid, the former Israeli prime minister in a December 10 Haaretz article https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/2023-12-10/ty-article-opinion/.premium/the-best-way-israel-can-destroy-hamas-is-by-attacking-their-financial-networks/0000018c-5001-df2f-adac-fe2d39920000    On December 16, there was also an article in the New York Times on this issue.   

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/16/world/europe/israel-hamas-money-finance-turkey-intelligence-attacks.html   Hamas has funding and Israel and its allies have some power to reduce or close its funding sources, a critical next step.  Knowing how to do this is going to be critical after this war and in the rebuilding of Gaza.  Mechanisms will be needed to ensure the money goes to civilian rather than to military purposes, if necessary, re-routing or closing the spigot when it does not.  This will be an ongoing and complex problem, as it has already been asserted that aid to civilians in Gaza is being diverted to Hamas.  

A broader strategy

The most interesting and pragmatic summary of a broader strategy that I have heard or read was in Ezra Klein’s (New York Times) December interview with Nimrod Novik,  a former policy advisor to Shimon Peres (who preceded Netanyahu), formerly involved in a number of negotiations with the Palestinians and the Arab states, and a member of Commanders for Israel’s security, an organization of retired military and intelligence people who have been studying this issue.  

The following summarizes and partially re-words what he said, and here is a link to the podcast. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/08/opinion/ezra-klein-podcast-nimrod-novik.html

Right now, there is no prospect for a two state solution, according to Mr. Novik’s group, but it is still important long term.  It has been clear for some time that the status quo is a mirage, given creeping annexation and the increasingly ineffective Palestinian Authority.  The Authority has been delegitimized, weakened and choked financially,  by the Israeli government, and the current Israeli government has also supported Hamas authority in Gaza, despite the periodic violence.  This did not work, yet there are things that Israel can still do to prevent the disaster of a one-state solution. 

Two states is still the preferable solution, because these two people cannot live together in one state.  The Palestinians can govern themselves—that was shown in 2007 and 2008, when the PA was revived dramatically.  Then Netanyahu was elected in 2009, and the Palestinian Authority was choked  and turned into a subcontractor of the occupation.  In the meantime, the PA became increasingly undemocratic and authoritarian.  

Israel must nevertheless commit itself to an eventual two-state solution says Novik.  If there is one state,  Jews will be a minority or a marginal majority in a state with equal rights, or Palestinians will have to forego equal rights.  Neither is possible, so separation is the only choice.  Movement towards separation is possible, even without two states, by reversing the slide towards one-state, that is the increased settlement, and by increasingly the capacity of the Palestinian Authority, while maintaining overall security by Israel until a deal is struck. 

In order to revive the Palestinian Authority, Israel needs to expand its geographic control,  giving-up small chunks of the West Bank, specifically areas that allow for contiguity between Palestinian areas, instead of the current swiss-cheese, which leaves these areas surrounded by Israelis.  There are also economic measures that would allow the PA to deliver, instead of the present practice, that is withholding tax revenue that is theirs and the main chunk of their budget. The PA cannot have legitimacy for its population if it is not the vehicle leading towards statehood, however long that might take. 

The only solution that will allow Israel to leave the Gaza strip is the PA, even in its current miserable state.  It will take years to revitalize it, and it cannot walk into Gaza as a proxy for Israel.  There needs to be a third party arrangement, for now.  The Palestinian Authority may not now be able to govern in Gaza, but it is needed to give legitimacy to whatever party governs Gaza when Israel pulls out.  The prime minister has said no to PA governance in Gaza, but there is no one else.  Under this government, Israel will be stuck in Gaza, running everything. 

The previous popularity of the Palestinian Authority depended on the viability of the Oslo Process.  That failed.  Now only Hamas is seen as doing anything about the occupation.  Novik blames Israel for teaching the Palestinians the wrong lessons.  After every round of violence, Hamas was rewarded with money and concessions, while the PA was choked, and the consequences in Gaza are devastating.  There are others to criticize, but as an Israeli he channels his complaints to his own government, which is supposed to service the security and well-being of the country.  The right wing members of the current government are using the war to do terrible things on the West Bank and to make sure that there is never a two-state solution.  All he can try to do is advocate a different course that will eventually lead to a different reality.

When Israel play its cards wrong, the consequences are serious.  There was an intelligence failure, where Hamas plans were known but dismissed.  If they had been taken seriously we might be living in a different reality.  The Prime Minister refuses to take responsibility, and he has lost public support.  He is accused of conducting the war with a conflict of interest, given his legal troubles.  He needs to go, and yet he may have an incentive to keep the war going.   We may pay a price for insisting that he is not gone—hopefully other members of government and the military heads are keeping tabs on any irregularity.  

The government did not exist the morning after October 7.  Not a single government agency was able to perform its duties.  It was voluntary organizations that stepped in for evacuees, that organized search and rescue missions, immediately after the attack, to find those in hiding.  The voluntary energy was huge.  When a prime minister appoints incompetent ministers, and they their own hacks, the professionals are unable to perform. 

Either Israelis separate from the Palestinians, or the Zionist dream is over.  It is a question of how to do it and whether the right leader can accomplish it.   The Commanders have been following public opinion, and Israelis don’t vote the Palestinian issue—typically there are other voting issues.   They vote Netanyahu, and he is an effective campaigner, or they vote the economy.  But if you check on the Palestinian issue, at least a plurality, if not a majority, would choose a pragmatic outcome.  If we have an Israeli government that goes for it, it will have majority support.  The problem is leadership.

Views evolve

As I read or listen, my own views evolve.   Without knowing whether Lapid or Novik are entirely correct, these are the opinions that command my attention, because they focus on protecting Israel while being practical and human and offering a vision for something better on all sides of this conflict.  The Israelis will almost certainly win the current war in Gaza.  After the war there will hopefully be peace, and reconstruction, but a long-lasting peace will be a peace that lifts oppression. 

The reaction in the United States

The reaction to the Gaza war in the United States has become a major issue, and it is important for American Jewry.  The present administration, in Washington, has given Israel substantive support, and there is considerable backing for Israel in Congress and in the American public.  Arguably this support has been too unconditional.  Without dictating to the Israelis, it might  have been wiser to condition American support, earlier and more forcefully. 

I have nevertheless been shocked by the intensity of the anti-Israeli reaction. I should not have been—the narrative has shifted from defenseless Israel, surrounded by hostile Arabs, to imperialistic/ occupier Israel, dominating the Palestinians.  The facts on the ground have indeed changed; Israel has become stronger, and both narratives have their truth.  That is not my fear.  Instead is the virulence and the focus on the Israel-Palestine issue, when there have been so many other misbehaviors, including our own historic “occupation” in the United States, the death and displacement in our Iraq and Afghan wars, and this is a short list.  (A quick google search of the number of deaths and refugees in Afghanistan and Iraq suggests that the Gaza War is small potatoes, although very intense.)

The focus on this particular conflict has several reasons. 

–There is the virulence of the Israeli reaction, when there are arguably other choices.  (Of course Hamas made and continues to make choices that promote its cause but are seemingly indifferent to Palestinian lives.)

–In addition, and to their credit, the Palestinians have been effective at advocating their cause.  They have had decades and the intelligence to do it, and they have gained support. 

–Israel and the West Bank are the Holy Land; this is a part of the world that commands the attention of the West and of the Middle East.   Because of its history, it is not ignored.  

–Israel has come to be viewed as a western, colonialist state.  This is not entirely true, as more or less half of Israelis come from the Middle East, but it has enough truth to catch on. 

And this is a time when western dominance and western colonial history are justifiably criticized, forgetting perhaps that western colonialism was a recent and effective form of human domination and cruelty, but by no means the first and only one. 

The danger of this focus is that it has leached into antisemitism.  While Gazan civilians are considered to be innocents, even if sympathetic to Hamas,  Israelis are not.   Even American Jews are viewed as white and privileged, which we are in the American context, and as a critical component of US government support for Israel.  This is probably true, whatever our varied opinions.  Nevertheless, I do not accept anti-Semitic co-branding.  It is much too dangerous and much too familiar; the degradations of the 20th century, the reasons Israel exists, are much too easily forgotten.

Fear

And thus my shocked reaction to recent congressional hearings, where three university presidents gave qualified answers to Elise Stefanik’s question, asking whether calls for the genocide of Jews violated campus rules on bullying and harassment.  She cornered them, with the most extreme question possible.

Only Dr. Kornbluth of MIT parried the question, pointing out that she had not heard calls for the genocide of Jews on her campus.  She said she had heard chants which can be anti-Semitic, depending on the context, when calling for the elimination of the Jewish people.  The presidents of Penn and Harvard however handled the repeated questions much less effectively, focusing on context and imminent threat, as if calling for genocide were not itself an imminent threat. 

I reacted emotionally to these answers, less so now with time, more reading and listening to the hearings again. I was surprised at how poorly these presidents defended themselves. I understood clearly, as though for the first time, that calling for the genocide of Jews might be acceptable.  For me this means that I no longer assume my safety in the United States.  The life I have had and its privileges no longer protect me.  As the wind blows, as time and politics change, kind, well-intentioned, highly placed people, may not defend us.  Should I be surprised?  Isn’t this Jewish history?   Didn’t I learn, years ago, that ethics yield quickly to general opinion, or self-interest?  But I believed in American exceptionalism and never imagined this. . . not in the world that I come from, not here. 

We do have a constitutional tradition of free speech, and so I remembered something years ago about  Nazis having been permitted to march in Skokie, Illinois.   A 2020 article by David Goldberger is posted on-line,  “How I Came to Represent the Free-Speech Rights of Nazis”, on the American Civil Liberties Union website.   It explains that the logic for taking and winning the 1977 court cases was the ACLU’s commitment to the First Amendment and to free speech, no matter how offensive the opinion.  He wrote,   “Central to the ACLU’s mission is the understanding that if the government can prevent lawful speech because it is offensive and hateful, then it can prevent any speech that it dislikes.”   In court against the Anti-Defamation League, the ACLU also argued that possible emotional harm was not a valid reason to deny the Nazi demonstrators’ rights.  (Of course universities are not governments or public places; I have read in more than one source, that private universities do have some right to limit speech on their campuses, although they may choose not to do so.) 

In a recent opinion, Bret Stephens, the New York Times columnist, accused the intellectual left of a double standard, arguing that the presumed need to defend free speech runs counter to the actual and ongoing censorship of “unacceptable” viewpoints on many university campuses.  In that context, the refusal to censor a call for Jewish genocide is unacceptable and anti-Semitic.   Free speech he wrote, requires accepting all controversial views.  https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/08/opinion/antisemitism-college-free-speech.html

My view is that we should have leaders who believe in limits on behavior and moral guidance, whose notions of right and wrong are clear, not absolute but to be absolutely defended.  We already killed the indigenous people in this country, and pushed them into reservations, much more effectively than the Israelis, and not too terribly long ago.  We benefitted, all of us, including those of us who immigrated afterwards, and we have effectively buried that sin.  It needs to be recalled. 

Calling for genocide again is extremely dangerous.  We can allow for criticism without permitting calls for genocide.   Stefanik was right; in this there is no context or relativism.  The sin of genocide is absolute.  

Therefore, within our free speech tradition, not every speech need be permitted, at least not with the public platform of a town park or a university campus.  Nor is the concept of “imminent lawless action” satisfactory.  It curtails speech only when the incitement is imminent and likely (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imminent_lawless_action), yet even an eventual threat can be very dangerous. 

Incendiary speech may not be threatening, when it is unlikely or occasional, and when the speakers are isolated individuals or small fringe groups, such as the Nazis were in the 1970’s.  But extreme views, and advocating violence, become much more serious when they become a movement and appeal to large numbers of people and their leaders.   Do we really want to live in a society where criticism of Israel leaches into overt anti-Semitism or other forms of prejudice or racism on campuses and in our cities?  Should we be protecting speech that advocates violence or extermination, of migrants or of white men or “occupiers”?  We have some rethinking to do if we are to survive as both a democracy and as a liberal society.  A liberal society is democracy with some limits.  No society works on absolute principles.   

Posted in Commentary, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

A Californian in New York

People have moved primarily west to California, but Californians also move to New York.  My family moved from New York and New Jersey to the Bay Area, in the early 1950’s, for better weather and a different life.  Dad took a teaching job at San Jose State, and we settled in Los Gatos, a town at the foot of the Santa Cruz mountains, west of San Jose and about 50 miles south of San Francisco.  It was an attractive, comfortable and relatively affordable place with a nice older downtown, old houses, apartments, and newer subdivisions. 

The suburban Bay Area was very different from the East and distinct from Los Angeles.  Indoor and outdoor living were integrated,  with relaxed social interaction,  simpler and fresher eating, sports and exercise: a new way of living.  Northern Californians were liberal, open, and low-key with a largely ahistorical and unstructured mindset.  They had come from across the country and abroad, assimilating into a relatively homogeneous, classless and egalitarian life that downplayed religious and ethnic differences.   In California they let go of the past to blend in, were free to become whomever they wanted to be, join whatever church they wanted to join,  to be a hippie or a Buddhist.  The transition was not easy—in the 1960’s, there were protests, violence and conflict.  But the Bay Area was open minded, forward looking, tolerant.

The weather and the landscape were appealing, so most young people stayed.  They went to college, enjoyed the weather, the beach, and a low key and not overtly competitive life.  That changed later.  Now it is wildly expensive and increasingly overheated.

This is a long introduction and background to my move to New York.  My sister also moved; she had a family and a teaching career in Eastern Canada.  We agree that our California was too homogenous, not quite interesting enough.  Our parents came from elsewhere; we had lived abroad and known other places.  We wanted more edge and stimulation and were looking to push ourselves a bit more or a bit differently—at least that is how we viewed it at the time.

My  move to New York City was back and forth.  I moved to Europe and then east and to New York for schools, then back to my parents’ and to San Francisco.  Then I returned to New York again; I hadn’t finished with it.  I was young and wasn’t interested in openness and ease, which at the time I took for granted.  I wanted a life that was more urbane and demanding, more sophisticated, more tied to history, and more anonymous since I was gay.

Manhattan offered all of these.  It encouraged me to push myself in my work and to be myself in ways that seemed impossible at home.  New York  had a greater reverence for education, for excellence, a greater respect for working, for knowing interesting people, for urbanity, for worldliness, for cosmopolitanism.  It still offers these, I think, although the values of my generation have been replaced by more broadly based, obvious, definitions of accomplishment and success. 

For gay men, New York offered a real life.  Media attention focused on the Village and Chelsea, on our sexual and cultural freedom, hedonism or diseases, but in fact we were able to explore  these things behind the protective “ordinary” advantages of college and graduate school degrees, theater, museums and music (for some, I was more of a reader), restaurants, and friends.  We could get good jobs, where we succeeded by fitting in and working hard or smart.  No one cared what we did outside the office.   And so we pursued lovers and boyfriends, gay political and social events (summers at the beach, for some, trips to Europe for me), apartments and furniture,  country-houses, travel. 

Friends from San Francisco or childhood eventually followed.  I began to see them, or their friends, in New York, relatively early.  Some were taking annual trips for shows and museums, for energy and density, for interesting shopping and food, sometimes for business.   Some bought New York apartments.  Sometimes their children came for school, careers and work.  But most of those in my generation kept the Bay Area as their base. 

They are not really New Yorkers.  Their outlook is too flexible,  too egalitarian, except perhaps their respect for financial success.  The Californian, more even than other Americans, has an open imprint and becomes whatever he or she wants to become.  There are no fixed constraints from the past; background, cultural, and educational differences are not fundamental.   At least that is how it was for us.   September 18,  2023

A bad day and a good one. 

Yesterday, for the second time since I returned to New York,  I watched a fight on the subway.   The first one was in July, on the number 1 train at Grand Central, when a man sitting next to me shouted and struck the passenger facing him as he was leaving the train.  The passenger had eyed him disapprovingly as he shouted in the subway car.  Today, it was a fist fight, next to me and near the door, again on the #1 train at 72nd Street.  This one lasted through several punches, inside and on the platform outside the train, one pushing the other to the ground.  One was angry at the way that the other was looking at him.

The police were on top of it, in both cases there in a minute or two, but it was out of control.   I would like to  have asked, “Did he abuse your mother, your girlfriend or your wife?  Steal all your money?  Why do you care how he looks at  you?”  Instead I shouted  “stop!”, urging an end to it, wanting the subway to move away as soon as possible.   I have been away, and the craziness and resentment in New York look worse than before. These are not the 1970’s or 80’s, but I rarely saw this hostility when I lived here all the time.  

Still, New York is a city with warm and friendly people. Last night I was invited to a Rosh Hashanah dinner, by “M” a friend from my morning swim group at Columbia.  She is an amazing swimmer and also my first observant, Orthodox, friend.  It is surprising that I have not had others, since I live in New York, but we live in bubbles.  Yes, like all Jews, I am descended from the Orthodox, but the last were my great-grandparents on my mother’s side, even earlier on my father’s.  My religious education ended when I was 13, and for much of my life, I held onto a Jewish identity while continuing and preferring to assimilate.

“M” has no need for that.  She and her husband balance observance and openness;  they have not given up one for the other.  They live in their informed practice and belief and yet they know, work, and interact with many different kinds of people.  And so I was at her holiday dinner where another guest’s vegan preference was entirely accommodated.  M’s  family is open minded, accomplished, conversational and warm.  Yet her grandchildren will be going to Jewish day schools, and adult family members follow and participate in Hebrew reading and prayers before and after the meal.

This was not my life, nor the life of my parents, certainly not in the Bay Area.  As a gay man, it was not a choice that I could easily have made.  We have taken other directions, done and learned other things, and I am very grateful for the freedom I had and for the many places and people I have known and met.  But in my immediate family a lot has been forgotten.  I am single, and my sister intermarried;  our Judaism may end in the next generation.  A little more of “M” might have been good for us. September 16, 2023

A New York apartment

There is nothing like a New York apartment.  This I write with great feeling, since I spent my entire working life in residential real estate, and have always loved beautiful, useable things, furniture, apartments and houses. 

My apartment is a safe and quiet place.  An expression of my individuality,  tastes and relationships, perhaps excessively so since I never married.  When I seek to define my identity, the apartment comes with it.  It is where I established myself and reinforced my values, as something separate from the competitive and sometimes diminishing demands of money and work.  When I felt at times that I was not terribly attractive, brilliant or significant, I withdrew to my apartment, where I was and remain, a prince if not a king. 

For more than twenty years, my apartment was also my office.  My desk sits at a large window in the living room, looking out on trees and townhouses that line the street.  I spent thousands of hours there, at my laptop and on the phone, or reading on the couch or in a chair.   It is a relatively quiet and light-filled place, my ideal spot for writing, thinking, moping, musing. . .

Manhattan apartments are expensive, although I bought mine many years ago.  In addition to mortgage costs, monthly maintenance charges–that is my share of the building’s real estate taxes, debt and services–are about $1,500, a significant number, particularly in retirement.   But housing is a critical good, and a nice apartment is an advantage in a big city, where the trains and streets are crowded and sandwiches now cost $10 to $16.  When I was younger, going out was my preference, and I was commonly in restaurants three times a week.  Now I go to overcrowded and overpriced grocery stores but have the peace and pleasure of a small but well organized kitchen, where I can prepare my own meals or share them with friends.

I am extremely lucky to have a very special apartment, renovated by my old boyfriend who helped me finish it even after we split up.   (He is now married and lives upstairs.)

He is a talented designer, quite good with his head and his hands, and he transformed an old crummy place into something unusually beautiful, with a corner living room, dining room, small kitchen, bedroom, bathroom, and entry hall.   There is a lot of closet space and very good book shelves, and it faces outwards, into trees.

Now retired, I am rarely there.  This summer I was upstate, at a house in the country.  Most of the time I am in Europe, exploring family and other history and interests.  I have wanted another home, in Vienna or Paris, or somewhere else, but I’m unable to replace my New York apartment.  It’s too much work and too much money, too much history, too many friends in the building and in town, too much love.  I cannot replace it.  So I’ve kept it, turning up from time to time to touch base with home, thinking perhaps that I’ll be there as a very old man, if I get that far, remembering the past and looking into the trees. September 25, 2023

Homosexuality and my lovers

Homosexuality is now widely tolerated, but that was less so forty years ago.

New York and San Francisco were magnets for gay boys and men; there were perhaps others, but these were the major havens and the cities I knew well.  I lived in both but eventually chose New York because, as I have written, it was the city where I could explore my sexual and romantic life in anonymity. I did not live in a gay neighborhood or dress differently.  I had a professional career, like everyone else. I benefited from being far away from home, but nevertheless in the city where I was born. 

Of course there were more constraints to these freedoms than I admitted at that time.  I gave up the dream of working in the Foreign Service for more than one reason, but I knew that it did not work for openly gay men. I turned down an offer from Corning Glass in upstate New York, because I could not imagine one or two years as an assistant controller at a factory in Kentucky.  I chose residential real estate because houses were a primary interest—and because it was a friendly business to gay men.  All of these choices were made, even before I came out.

I did not have romantic relationships with women but otherwise lived my life as most of us did, with both gay and straight friends and a wide variety of clients.  No one at work was interested in my sexual preference.  It was not a topic of conversation, and I discretely sheltered it behind the conventional expectations of privilege.

But in the evenings, and on the weekends, I went out.  I moved to Manhattan, or rather I returned to it in 1985, in my 30’s, and only then was I sexually and romantically active.  I had, I thought, broken through all my previous attractions to unavailable men, yet most of the men I met were never really available.  But the attractions were powerful and the pursuits tantalizingly close. 

In the years before the internet, we met in bars; my favorite was on the Upper West Side where I lived, on Columbus Avenue at 81st Street.  I went frequently in the evenings to look for men, for eye contact, an expression of sexual interest, never approaching a man who had not returned my gaze.  I met many men this way, and was frequently deflected or rejected. 

It was on Columbus Avenue that I met “S”, another westerner, from Seattle.  He was a thin, fashionable architect, interesting, talented, intense, hardworking, full of feelings.   We moved in together, bought an apartment.  Then after five years, we split; he found other boyfriends, and I became endlessly single.  I have never entirely let go of him—I love him too much.  And then years later at another bar, in the East 50’s, I met “K”, a tall lanky black man, elusive, tied to his family and his church, honest and loving, a saint.  We were never a couple, but we were lovers for nearly ten years.  “K” was compelling,  real, his heart, his skin; I trusted him.  White men were washed out and vapid.  But we couldn’t communicate.  Neither of us wanted the other enough; the differences in everything were too great.  But I loved him. September 2023

My Years at Princeton

I cannot write about New York without revisiting my years at Princeton, since Princeton, had so much to do with how I lived here.   A prestige education is about learning, but it also signaled intelligence and intellectual training.  It had social advantages, conferring some privilege even without much money. This was most certainly the case in New York where status matters. 

In California,  my parents were unusual in emphasizing a rather strict morality and education.  By education they meant reading, some knowledge of our religion and the arts, and a sensitivity to ethics and the importance of politics and history, since our father spoke of these frequently and read extensively.  I resisted listening to him, unfortunately in retrospect, but do not doubt his impact.  At a very early age, my mother took us to the library, and I  devoured books,  mostly history and became a serious student.  College was expected and not just any college.  My sister and I were encouraged to work and reach for the best schools possible, and we did.  Eventually, in 1973, I was accepted to Princeton as a junior year transfer student, then a fairly remarkable accomplishment, although not unique in my parents’ circle.   

A family emphasis on education was not unusual in Jewish families, and in addition there was my father’s academic career and his liberalism.  Knowledge and contribution were supreme in his mind.  With these values he had a great deal of influence on my mother and on his children.  He did not tell me—he knew but did not fully understand what it meant—that Princeton was not only a school that educated, but also a place that formed and socialized an elite,  including many children of the existing elite.  This elite was conscious of its history (if it had one), its wealth (if it had any)  and its position, and it expected interesting careers and some command of things (although I never really ran much of anything).  It was impressive and sometimes socially and intellectually sophisticated.  These were goals to reach for, and I reached, but sophistication is a limited accomplishment, and New Yorkers valued other goals. October 2023

Working in New York

This is about my work in New York, since I am no authority on the work of others.  My work was not a career, surprisingly since I was seemingly prepared for one, more a discipline, a function of my interests and concerns.  It gave me, eventually, safety and independence, some authority but limited success, but for many years I did not care or understand this.

After college, I worked briefly,  then entered Columbia Business School, not because I was interested in business, although I thought of international business, but because I felt I needed another degree and had resisted my father’s encouragement to go to law school.  Law school was a conventional ambition, I thought.  Academia was something that I wanted to avoid—too sheltered for me, I thought.  Choosing business was a rebellion, but only against my parents.  I did not see how limited and conventional it could be.  

Only when I graduated did I see how poor the fit was.  I left business school without a job, turned down the one job that was offered to me, and moved back to my parents’ house in California.  Eventually I chose residential real estate, because housing personally interested me, whereas money as a commodity didn’t interest me much. I started as a real estate broker in San Francisco, in a friendly and civilized market, and then after five reasonably successful years, moved again to Manhattan, which was larger and much more competitive.

New York was the big deal. I wasn’t done with it.  San Francisco was small—everybody knew everybody.  I wanted scale and anonymity.  I had bigger ambitions, and so I returned, and then after a few years was back on track. Since I was a reader and a writer, I focused on appraisal and market analysis in Manhattan.  It was a specialty field, catering to the needs of a small number of very wealthy clients, but I became one of the few who was very good at it.  I focused on lengthy detailed reports, used by attorneys in dispute resolution and litigation support, and I was able to see and write about markets and interesting and beautiful things.  I developed the independence that I wanted and believed that I was doing something for my clients.  But I served a very narrow and status-and-money-oriented world; I never had the courage or the ability to engage in topics or issues of broader importance.  October 1, 2023

Museums, Theater, Medical Appointments and People

New York is a city of theater, and museums, art, music and great restaurants, and I rarely go.  I occasionally meet friends for an exhibit or a play, but it has typically been at their suggestion.  I am not one that follows these things. 

How can it be that I have lived for so many years in a major cultural center and taken so little advantage of it?   As a child, I saw so much with my parents in Asia, where we lived, and in Europe, museums and palaces, temples and churches.  I was less motivated to see these as an adult.  My biggest interest was domestic architecture, and I was able to see so a lot of it in my work.  Otherwise, I enjoyed being at home, cooking (later in life), reading and being with people.  I enjoy talking, hearing stories and sharing mine.  People are what makes a city great for me, and New York is filled with interesting people, backgrounds, problems and personalities. 

While I am a Californian, I have lived in New York since 1985, longer than anywhere else.  My mother was a refugee and an immigrant, but I am also a fourth generation New Yorker, with great grandparents on both sides, here before World War I.  I don’t see the past around me—New York is not like that—but I’m aware that it is here.

I am in New York for much of the month of September.  It is an old man’s visit—I am 70—with medical appointments: that is cataract surgeries, ophthalmology appointments, the optician, the cardiologist, an artery scan at Mt. Sinai, and a colonoscopy.  My body is being checked and rebuilt, hopefully for its remaining twenty years.  I’ve been told to lose more weight and cut back on sugars.  I am willing to work at it, not so much to live longer as to maintain my quality of life.  There is a vanity in it and a continued desire to live, even as I feel the weakening. 

But there has been much more to this visit.  I was away most of this past year and so have been seeing people, old friends, neighbors, and cousins.  I’ve had guests for brunch and dinner,  have seen or will visit older friends, and will be at a funeral this weekend.  It is the people I know that hold me here. 

But for anyone who wants to know about the most interesting exhibits and the best plays or restaurants, I am not a good source. 

October 1, 2023

Posted in Commentary | 3 Comments

Summer 2023

my 70th.

I follow the news and have been wondering if I can help the state of the world, but this summer is my 70th, and it has been much easier to cook and take care of my garden.  For the past three months, it has been at my house in the mountains in upstate New York.   The air has been cool and the light very beautiful.  The problems of climate change, war, and poverty have been shielded from me by the lawn, the hedge, flowering shrubs, and views of the mountain.

I cannot reform the Democratic Party or stop the Republicans, nor can I keep right wing parties from taking power in Europe, but I have found a good housekeeper, had some rooms painted, and ordered fabric and new slipcovers.  I have invited friends and cousins, cooked, cleaned up, listened and talked.  It is interesting to speculate about those in power.  Might we be better-off if they spent some time with their friends and in their gardens?

People are endlessly interesting.  I love their thinking, their histories and concerns; the best way to talk, to hear them, is over a drink or a meal.   When I was younger, this was often in restaurants.  But over the years I bought and renovated an apartment and a house.  Now, I am happier in my own places, with a kitchen and guests. 

Food is important, and so is flavor; simpler food satisfies me the most.  I’ve learned a bit from better cooks, and I have started baking their easy desserts.  Yesterday afternoon it was brownies.  I was surprised how much sugar was in them, since most desserts are too sweet; now I’m guessing that there is even more sugar in those I buy.  Wine is more complicated, and I don’t need to master it, but I read, ask around a bit and stock a few cases in a stone basement.  Some of it has aged beautifully; at other times it wasn’t worth keeping, or I waited too long. Presentation and context matter, so I pay attention to how a table is set; we start with a drink outside, or in a comfortable room in winter with a fire.  

This weekend a friend and her daughter shopped and cooked—a gift.  They made dinner for twelve on Saturday and brunch for eighteen on Sunday, the largest of several weekend gatherings for my 70th.  It had been a long time since I last had a party or a large dinner.  I don’t have a large table, except in the kitchen where my friends were cooking, so we sat at smaller tables in the dining room, the living room and the library. 

There were plenty of white dishes and glasses, and Danish stemware that was my parents’.  I brought my silverware from New York and asked my sister to look through our parents’ things for table cloths.  She chose three; one she bought in China decades ago.

Everything was set for a personal gathering.  It was a lot of work, but this dinner was for people whom I know well and love:  the friends who cooked, my sister and her husband, my oldest friend whom I met in India in 1964, his wife, my beloved ex (since 1992) and his husband,  a very good friend from San Francisco who is frequently in New York, and great friends from my building who also live upstate. 

At the end of the dinner, I spoke about each of them.  It’s something I also did on my 50th when my parents were here.  I had decided against it but changed my mind; in friendship I have been unusually fortunate.  I’m not sure  that I have given enough, to them or to society, but that thought is for another essay.

Aging

At 70 years,  I swim, stretch and exercise regularly, but deterioration is inevitable.  This year has been a first for extensive repairs,  addressing each intervention as I move around.   This month it is my eyes—cataract removal and new lenses at a clinic in Astoria, Queens.  In March I had prostate surgery at a clinic in Paris.  In the spring, it was new hearing aids in Vienna.  Yesterday, the cardiologist wrote that my blood sugar and bad cholesterol are a little high.  It is endless, but I am lucky to have access to the technology and the care. 

I am hoping that the repairs,  simpler eating and some additional weight loss will stabilize things for a while.  Their purpose is to be here, to delay death, which no longer seems so far away– to continue to do and see new things in physical comfort.   But to what purpose?   What do I want in my remaining life? 

Home

Home has always been critical for me.  But where home will be is less clear.   I want to continue living in the city, and in the cooler mountains during the summer, but Manhattan is expensive and upstate New York distant from friends and difficult without driving.  

I’m retired, in Europe now much of the year, and losing my sense of place.  Both my New York apartment and my house are exactly as I wanted them, thanks to the talent and labor of my ex.  They are deep in my experience, like old friends and lovers, and I am loathe to separate from them, but will they correspond to my means and to my life?

Is it because I am single?  If I had someone to move with, would it matter?  Might my sense of home be bound to another person rather than to place?   As it is, these places are repositories of my memory and context for my personality.   They seem irreplaceable.  But I  sense that, eventually, decisions will have to be made.  

In my imagination, there is a large studio apartment in a small city or town, with large rooms and French doors overlooking a plaza. It is furnished with a large table, two upholstered chairs, a day bed, or perhaps a double.  Here I read and write, stay in touch, and cook for myself and others.  I have a lot of time alone, but I accept the loneliness.  It is the life I have chosen.  I am in touch with everyone; there is a cheap hotel nearby for guests, and somewhere in the background there may be intimacy.  I am a foreigner; I may not speak the language, but from it, I can travel and see clearly.  Perhaps it is in Italy, or in Spain, not countries where I have friends or strong interests, but for some reason I am happy, happy enough to have let go of some or all of what I have.  Is this vision concrete?   I am not sure, but I write it out to test how it feels. 

New interests

Retired, I am trying new things, some of them productive, some just flailing.   I went to Vienna last year with great enthusiasm, a new citizen of the country where my mother was born, an opportunity to pursue other interests.

But no one really needs anything from me anymore;  I no longer have a job or specific responsibilities, so what I am I there, or here,  to do?  My interests have shifted.  I  want to see different worlds and describe what I see.   Vienna’s scale, its pace, its cafés, even sometimes its faces, are familiar, a place I’d like to further understand.   Yet is quite clearly foreign.

It is time to get back to the books in my library and on my phone, to allow them to lead me forward, so that I can plan my visits, my interests and my writing.

Summer has ended, although mine is not over yet. There is still time to prepare for Vienna and my return in the fall.

Posted in Commentary | Leave a comment

My walks in Vienna

I love cities and buildings and walking around and exploring. My friends are often interested in theatre, art or music, and that makes sense, but for me walking is usually enough. It’s both the seeing and the anticipation that come from it that are engaging, even if I don’t look into anything too deeply.

Wandering aimlessly can limit me to a city center or the same places that everyone else visits. Or it can lead to wandering in uninteresting places, because it is great to walk without a plan, but sometimes it is to nothing worthwhile.  The usual solution is guide books, but I have had guidebook vacations and would prefer to reach for something more.

Following are some of my walks in Vienna, those that I have planned, the places I have stopped and references to what I have read. This is a post in progress. If you have opened it early, there may be only one. But come back; there will be more. I am spending some time here.

Piarist Square, Josefstadt district, April 2023

For Vienna  I have the internet and two books: Carl Schorske’s Fin-de-Siecle Vienna–we read it in his class at Princeton in the 1970’s–and Vienna Art and Architecture, an edited volume by several authors published in 2008. 

For architecture, Schorske focuses on Vienna’s late 19th century redevelopment, specifically the Ringstrasse, a wide boulevard that surrounds old Vienna, and on its contemporary critics, Camillo Sitte and Otto Wagner.  According to Schorske, Sitte was a theorist who admired craftsmanship but disliked the traffic-oriented Ring and its free floating buildings, which lacked human scale.  He preferred the intimacy and the community of the older city, specifically the square,  and his favorite, the Piarist Square, whose church façade was renovated by his father, and where he attended the gymnasium.

So on a Saturday afternoon I decided to have a look at the square and the church.  Getting there began with a ride on the U6 metro line, an elevated stretch of the old Stadtbahn, which runs in the center of Vienna’s highly-trafficked Gürtel, or Beltway. The Gürtel encloses the Innere Stadt (the Inner City), the Ring and much, but not all pre-World War I Vienna.  Like the Ring, the Gürtel replaced a line of outer fortifications in the late 19th century.  Here is a map:   https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wiener_G%C3%BCrtel_Stra%C3%9Fe_Karte.png

The Stadtbahn was designed by the Otto Wagner, the antithesis of Sitte, a modernist, but my focus was on getting to the Piarist Square.  I have been on this metro line many times, typically to go to the Stadthallenbad swimming pool and frequently I notice the beauty of its viaduct structure and stations, and in particular the emphasis on glass and light. Whatever Wagner’s modernist and functionalist theory, he was also creative in the use of ornament, fusing and simplifying traditional detail in service of something that was entirely new.   

the metro station at Josephstädter Strasse

stairs at the metro station, Josefstädter Strasse

After leaving the station,  I crossed the Gürtel, to Josefstadter Strasse, which initially looked like a plain city street, and then I hopped on a streetcar that was heading in the wrong direction, but for just one stop. I got off and walked to Piarist Square, through a neighborhood of handsome 19th century buildings and attractive shops and restaurants. 

Piarist Square
Piarist Square
Piarist Square, the fourth side

The Piarist church has an appealing baroque façade, but the square surprised me.  It was raining when I arrived, and it was almost silent; perhaps due to the weather or the season it was not the gathering place I had imagined.  The square is formed by the church façade, framed by two lower buildings with plain façades, acting as wings on either side.  Over one ornamented doorway, the term “Gymnasium” signals the teaching vocation of the Piarists and a much more active square on weekdays.  The two wings or arms reach to a relatively narrow street, where more conventional 19th century buildings form the square’s fourth side. 

the church and to its right, the Gymnasium

This was not at all what I had expected.  I had thought instead of a busier place, of the kind I see frequently in Europe, with more traffic and shops. Of course,  I had not seen the square on a school day, or on a clear day when the café is open, nor do I know what it looked like in the late 19th century, but my vision of Sitte’s ideal was now one of quiet removal, rather than of a square that is at the center of things. 

the stage entrance of the Josefstadt Theater
Josefstadter Strasse: a supermarket sign on an unusual facade

I turned again towards Josefstadter Strasse, passing the stage entrance of the Josefstadt Theater, where Beethoven and Wagner conducted and which is now the oldest theater in continual use in Vienna.  (I’ve checked its website and see that the current performances are theater, not music. They include the German language premiere of Tom Stoppard’s Leopoldstadt.)  On Josefstadter Strasse there were other visual treats, including an old apothecary shop and a “Living Art” store, Wohn-Art-Wien, displaying furnishings from the early 20th century.

Wohn Art
Wohn Art

I noted also the sober,  handsome “Institute for Advanced Studies”, a social and economic research center founded in the early 1960’s by émigré Austrian academics, with the support of the Ford Foundation and the Austrian government.  From the street  a 19th century addition is visible, to what was originally an 18th century palace.  And like the Piarist square it thas three sides facing the street, but narrower and closed off by a gate. 

the Institute for Advanced Studies

a facade on Josefstadter Strasse

I noticed this extraordinary modernist facade, walking to the square and then again on my way back. Around the corner from another extraordinary facade, on the Handlesakademie II der Wiener Kaufmannschaft (Commercial Academy II of Vienna’s Merchant) which has its origins in 1857. This is one of several locations of is now called the Vienna Business School, since 1997.

Handlesakademie II der Wiener Kaufmannschaft
Hamerling Park

The school faces Hamerling Park, built on the site of the Josefstadt barracks, which were demolished in 1910. Robert Hamerling was an Austrian poet.

Posted in Commentary, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Two months in Paris

We associate the French with beauty, refinement, elegance, grandeur. These are visible everywhere in Paris, as is occasional disorder and chaos, but underlying them is a discipline that is harder to discern. This year I was in Paris for more than two months: the first at the end of January to visit and see friends, and then again from mid-March to late April, for surgery.  Much of what I read and hear about France does not parallel my experience . . .so I’ve compiled a few short essays here.

Paris for the tourist

There is a lot of traffic in Paris; it is heavily visited and it can be exhaustingly crowded.  Many of the stores and restaurants are formulaic, although less so than in New York where I have lived for many years. The metro is often packed, the accordion-playing street musicians predictable. Public toilets are self-cleaning but spoiled by vagrants.  

Much of the city is a theme park to French history.  Last year I re-visited the Musée du Quai d’Orsay and the state rooms at Versailles, but the crowding was unbearable.  There are other things to see.  Years ago, a student, I walked into the medieval Sainte Chapelle, sat down and enjoyed the tall stained glass windows.  I remembered this as I passed by yesterday on the Isle de la Cité.   However, there are now tickets, a line, and a security screening.  I didn’t want to spoil the memory, so  I kept on walking.

The Sainte Chapelle, without the crowds, as I remember it, Wikimedia Commons, February 2022

My German teacher says that European tourism changed when the iron curtain fell in the 1990’s, opening up travel from eastern Europe. Later there were large numbers of visitors from Asia.  Visitors spend money; there is a lot to do, and the business is welcomed.  Yet many European cities are theme parks, pushing out real life, open air museums, where crowds of visitors look at each other.  There is more than a bit of this in Paris. The complaint is not only mine. The Louvre Museum is limiting visitors to 30,000 per day, a proposal which will be tested this summer.

According to its director, Laurence des Cars, people want to return to museums and rediscover the pleasure of contemplating art, directly, not through a screen, to share this experience, across generations and in families. Doing so should be as comfortable as possible and should offer exceptional moments in overcharged lives. If the Louvre, a magnificent place, with extraordinary spaces, is saturated with visitors, a part of that pleasure is lost. (See Financial Times interview, April 21, and FranceInter interview on You-tube 2023, copy the link here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYJmTNH-G6s)

I have seen the great sites. I now prefer the view of Notre Dame at a distance while its roof is being rebuilt.  I want to talk to people, focus on old friends, visit quieter places or those that hold my memories.  (I’ll revisit the Louvre, when its new program is in place. . . )

January 27, on the rue de Vaugirard

In Paris since Friday after five weeks of traveling, I am tired and happy in friends’ comfortable one bedroom apartment on the rue de Vaugirard.  It  is at the rear of the building, quiet, accessible with a tiny elevator—the kind that was added years after the building’s construction.  It has a small windowed modern kitchen, a dining table that seats four, a fold-out couch in the living room, enough room for dinner and sleepover guests.  I am in the 15th arrondissement, across from the Hôpital Necker for sick children, which is very convenient, near three metro stops and within easy walking distance of shopping, the Montparnasse train station and the 7th and 6th arrondissements.  

Tonight, I am having dinner guests, an old friend, and her brother and sister-in-law.  My friend told me that the others eat simply, without sauces, so my plan for a boeuf bourgignon is for another time.  Shopping on this section of the rue de Vaugirard is limited, so yesterday I walked across the Boulevard Pasteur to rue Lecourbe, where the stores are more varied and interesting.  I stopped first at a butcher and had him slice two chicken breasts into cutlets.  I also asked for two herb sausages, presumably pork, for another day.  Then I shopped at a Franprix, a chain market, for rice, mustard, breakfast food, and dried prunes for a dessert I had tried on Sunday, when friends invited me to at a restaurant in the 7th.  I also bought two soft cheeses, one goat, as these are cheaper in the the Franprix and will add one or two more  at the adjacent cheese store later today.  On my way back, I stopped at a nearby wine store, Nicolas, for Armagnac and wine. 

Armagnac, which I used to stew the prunes, is a brandy of various white wines, cellared in oak barrels.  My bottle was from Chateau de Laubade, in lower  or “bas” Armagnac in southwest France.  It was cellared for 12 years and cost 45 euros.  To serve with the chicken, the wine merchant recommended a 2021 pinot noir, from the Domaine de l’Aigle, also in the south of France, about 15 euros.  It was very good, indeed the wine merchant made two very good recommendations while I was on Vaugirard; the chicken was also very good, less so my version of the prunes, which were more delicate in the restaurant. 

February 6, the Marais

Yesterday, an old friend invited me to lunch in the Marais with her daughter and two grandchildren. Her daughter recently found a studio apartment near the Place des Vosges, in a walk-up building, overlooking a garden courtyard at the rear and a street on the front.  It has a sleeping loft, with 17th or 18th century half-timbered walls and high ceilings.  A 19-year-old grandson lives there, preparing for his concours, the competitive entrance exams for France’s grandes écoles.  France has a very competitive system, where students spend over a year preparing for examinations that determine acceptance at some of its most prestigious universities. Classes and study take up nearly all of his time, and there are no guarantees. (I worked hard in school, but competition was more varied, subjective, and not based on a single test.)

Downstairs is a small, classic, restaurant, where my friend invited us all to lunch.  I had confit de canard with potatoes and was full for the rest of the day.

Afterwards we went to the Musée de la Chasse et de la Nature,  which has an extraordinary collection of animal trophies and guns.  Man’s long relationship to beautiful animals, that is killing them, is not at all hidden, and the museum is beautiful, with careful attention to detail.   The renovated buildings, two old, aristocratic hôtels, are as wonderful as the collection.  The staircase rails are bronze branches, some light fixtures a combination of bronze antlers, bronze branches and organic glass bulbs; the walls are painted in deep rich colors, the exhibits are in 19th century display cases. The effect is that of a private, almost over-furnished residence, intimate and exquisite. 

Musée de la Chasse et de la Nature

At the end of the afternoon, we went shopping for a replacement for my shabby winter coat.  My friend reminded me that men dislike shopping. She was right; I am intimidated in stores, but she is twice widowed, a mother and a grandmother, and like my own mother a lifetime ago, an effective shopper. 

Affluent American women often enjoy, exquisite, unique and expensive purchases.  Less so in the French bourgeoisie, where elegant women often take pride in careful expenditure, suitable or chic, but reasonably priced.  Under her direction, I found a new coat, with a hood, in dark blue, on sale, and marked down from 250 euros to 98.   I invited my friend for a cappuccino afterwards.  (Another friend in London has now given me a possum and marino-wool red cap to wear with it.)

February 17

Food was again my destination yesterday, this time at the Marché Couvert des Enfants Rouges (Covered Market of Red Children) in the Marais district, introduced to me by my friend Alexandre, and which dates to the early 17th century.  There is generally more choice and activity in the morning, but I walked there in the early afternoon, after some hours reading and exercising at home.

Walking itself is part of a destination.  When I look at people and stores, I indulge my attractions, but also frequently imagine that I am furnishing an apartment, equipping a kitchen, buying food, or stopping in a café or restaurant.   

My walk was east on the rue de Vaugirard, to the rue du Cherche-Midi, across the Boulevard Montparnasse and into the 6th arrondissement.  On narrow old Cherche-Midi, the stores are rich and interesting, carefully put together: a cheese shop, a kitchenware place, a dessert bakery/café that I eventually visited, an 18th century hôtel with a closed museum.  As I approached the Seine, and crossed the Boulevard St. Germain, the streets were more crowded, the cafés less interesting.

I crossed the river, the Isle de la Cité,  and again the Seine, looking at grand 19th century theaters on the Place du Châtelet, the medieval tower of St. Jacques behind them, and then I walked into the Marais, which dates to the Renaissance.  I stopped again at the large BHS department store, for no better reason than to use the toilets.  These are on the top floor, on my way out, I stopped at the Figaret boutique.  Figaret’s dress shirts were my ideal of elegance thirty years ago.  Here they were on sale at 40 or 50% off.   I enjoyed looking, and the saleswoman warned me that the fin des soldes was an opportunity, but now, looking was for the memory of buying in Paris, at another time, when I worked in an office in New York and took my shirts to the laundry.  Now I wash and iron them myself.

I continued north, past the hôtel that houses the national archives.  There was a sign for an exhibit on the last, deposed, royal family’s years at the Tuileries (1789-92), but the opening was in March.  The Marché couvert des Enfants Rouges is a bit further up, on the rue de Bretagne, near the Square du Temple, where the royal family was emprisoned prior to the executions of Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette in 1793.  North of the square and adjacent to the market entrance, the rue de Bretagne is a paradise of food and cafés.  A Maison du Chocolat, a cookie shop, a smoked salmon place, a small tourist hotel. . . I entered the market, which is quiet in the late afternoon.  The vendors were in meeting–things are organized and done the right way in France–which is not always the same thing as being constantly available. So I waited for help at the cheese counter. 

entrance to the market

A young woman, a niece of the owner, came to help me; I chose a goat cheese covered in ash, a buffalo camembert, and a third cheese, that I am trying now.  I don’t know its name, but tastes like raw milk with herbs.  I picked up two apples, for the cheese, but relented and later picked up a baguette tradition on the rue de Vaugirard.  After dropping my purchases at the apartment, I walked again to the Nicolas wine shop on the Avenue Pasteur.  The same salesman gave me another great red wine recommendation, for goat cheese, a 2021 Valencay blend, from the Loire Valley, at 8 or 9 euros. 

chèvre aux cendres (goat cheese in ash)

February 18

My primary preoccupation is apparently food, but there is also swimming . . I took the metro yesterday to the Sablons station in Neuilly-sur-Seine and walked to the Centre Aquatique, a covered complex of three pools, including  a 25 meter lap pool, which is not usually overcrowded.  The staff at the door is friendly, the changing rooms individual and very clean; the code-controlled lockers secure and easy to use.  Swimming in Paris can be a nightmare;  the public pools are very busy and there are few rules for sharing lanes, if there are lanes.  But in Neuilly, I’m able to swim in reasonable peace with courteous fellow-swimmers. The pool is closing next summer for an estimated 18-month renovation—unfortunately for my visit here next year.  For now, it is conveniently located, a five minute walk to my close and oldest friends in France, F and C, who had invited me to dinner. 

Near them, on the rue de Chézy, is another small, recently-opened cheese shop, owned by the green grocer a few doors away.  It has an attractive glass front, display cases on the sides and a counter at the back.  Looking in from the street, I eyed some jams and asked the young salesman whether these were the best in existence.  He assured me that they were and suggested, that given my culture, I might prefer the bitter orange alternative.  I asked what he thought my culture was; English, he said.  This is common in France, where some assume we are English if not the type of American they expect.  Still, this young man was not just a salesman but also a trained specialist. His work was preceded by specialized schooling in cheeses; his knowledge is detailed.

February 20, a day in the suburbs

Yesterday, Sunday, I took a train to Issou-Porcheville, 16 stops and an hour northwest of  Paris, along the Seine river,  where friends had scheduled to pick me for lunch at their place.  I was early at the Gare de St. Lazare, and so took an earlier train than we had agreed, assuming that I would have a coffee while waiting,  at the Issou-Porcheville station.

Isn’t there a village and café at every train station in France?  Not here, Issou-Porcheville is merely a commuter stop between two villages.  A local told me that the village was a long walk, about a kilometer.  Still not having absorbed that a kilometer is only about .62 miles, I turned back and waited at the train stop.  The man I spoke to was black, as were a lot of the people at the station.  It is remarkable how multicultural Paris is, multi-accented and French speaking.  I spoke briefly with a woman from the Ivory Coast, who was waiting for the bus and listening to what sounded like a political rally on her phone.  I asked another man coming out the station whether there was a bathroom or a café nearby.  Nothing, he said and recommended the bushes in good humor. We had a conversation a bit later.  He is not local, and not black, but the employee of a charter bus company handling alternative transportation, while repairs are made to one of the RER regional transportation linesOther weekends he is at other locations; the public would not tolerate closures during the week, he said.

My friends own a pleasant house close to the Seine river.  When I arrived, their daughter-in-law introduced herself, and brought her three children to the back terrace to meet me.  She told each of them to say hello, allowing the middle one to hide behind her legs.  Her husband, an engineer in his 30’s, greeted me in an open and friendly manner.  I asked if we had met previously; we could not remember, and if so it was many years ago.  This family is not formal, but there is traditional discipline.  Aperitif was in the living room, with a very interesting conversation about the preservation of archival documents, followed by lunch at a large table in the dining room. This was a lamb stew, red or white wine, a cheese course with bread, a homemade apple cake, and the excellent remains of the prior day’s chocolate cake.  

After lunch we all took a walk on a public trail along the Seine, below the house. We passed a number of house boats—there are also many in Paris–and we saw an old, deteriorated and modest yacht, Winston Churchill’s Amazone, built in England in the 1930’s.  It is forlorn, seemingly forgotten, although there is a article in French, with good pictures,  posted on-line at:  https://www.bateaux.com/article/22238/amazone-yacht-de-winston-churchill-vente

Winston Churchill’s yacht

After lunch, I joined the children on another train back to Paris, not a commuter line, but a regional express, leaving from a larger town nearby.  It was overcrowded with people and luggage in the aisles, not at the standard of other train lines I have seen.  Most of the passengers were young, returning home from the weekend.  The trip into the Gare de St. Lazare was about 45 minutes. 

February 20, a detour to Nîmes

Last week I traveled with my very good friend Catherine to Nîmes on the high speed Train à Grande Vitesse (TGV) leaving from the Gare de Lyon.  We booked rooms at a cheap Ibis Budget hotel near the Nîmes train station, very basic and clean, at only 50 euros a night. 

Nîmes is quiet, not dead but a little tired in places, a ville de province.  History has passed it by, and yet it hasn’t.   It has some of the best Roman monuments in Europe: a perfectly formed temple set on a tall pedestal, with tall fluted, Corinthian columns, and a sculpturally beautiful coliseum.  Both are beautifully emphasized by 19th century urban planning, a large square for the temple and a surrounding street for the stadium.  A Roman museum, facing the coliseum, is a modern wonder of superb objects and accessible, sophisticated audio-visual displays.  There are beautiful parks, a canal and esplanades.  Nîmes appears to be doing everything right.  There is a food market in the mornings where we had bread and cheese with coffee, and many shops on the streets, although many are not terribly interesting.  I saw two supermarkets and visited one.  It had everything, but its interior was tired.  The property prices are low, the many 19th century buildings handsome.  The weather is cold in February, but it is sunny and bright.  (The air quality, unfortunately, was low during my visit.)  Not a bad place I think; perhaps I should spend more time here. But I am deterred by a sense of isolation—there are no memories for me, no connection, and I know no one in Nîmes.

breakfast facing the coliseum, Nîmes

19th century facades, Nîmes

February 21

Yesterday, I was invited to a luncheon in Marnes la Coquette.  My friends have told me that more and more Parisians are leaving the crowded center of the old city, settling in the suburban and smaller towns outside its periphery. 

I have visited our hostess a few times before, but I was again taken with the beauty of the town and of her apartment, in a large 19th century bourgeois mansion.  The ceilings are very tall as are the double French windows, set off from the garden by handsome ornamented rails.  The dining table was elegant and the food simple and delicate,  a soufflé quiche, salmon and vegetables baked in foil, a tasty white wine, and then crêpes, served with jam, or lemon juice or a chestnut cream.

Hers is a wonderful family that I have known for fifty years.  A younger sister is a Catholic nun, who administers an international network of schools for adults and children. With her was a sister from Vietnam, a teacher who lived through difficult circumstances after the communist takeover.  Monitoring schools and programs in differing countries and legal systems is astonishingly complex, yet the order seems to be run with simplicity and modesty.  I am not a Catholic, not even Christian, but these sisters were a window into a practical world that emphasizes faith.

February 22

Today I had some errands.  One of them was getting buttons re-sewn on my new winter coat.  I found a small retoucherie on the Avenue Pasteur, owned by a friendly Pakistani couple who said they could take care of it right away.   While I was waiting, I decided to get something to eat at a nearby café,  forgetting eating in France at one or two o-clock is lunch.  I wasn’t particularly hungry, but I decided to go with the flow and ordered a fish casserole.   It was baked and served hot with cream and potato in an earthenware ramekin.  There were no chunks —the fish had been worked into the mixture—but it was tasty.  A small leafy salad was served on the side, with a very good vinaigrette dressing.  

At the retoucherie, the owner spoke an accented but very good French.  He has lived most of his life in Paris, and he and his wife moved fairly recently to this 15th arrondissement neighborhood.  The clients are friendly and courteous, and loyal, he said. Unlike the many overweight women he has seen while visiting friends in England, French women keep themselves well, even older women.  They limit how much they eat.  They dress carefully and want their tailoring to be well done; they know and are observant to detail.  35 euros for a small alteration is not an issue,  but the work has to be done just right.  

February 25, pickpockets, etcetera

Thursday, on my way back to the apartment, on metro line 6, the doors opened at Trocadéro.  A woman started screaming, and a small crowd went to help her or leaned out of the train to look.  I could not see and decided not to join them, but I talked with those around me, a friendly black woman, across from me, who had just boarded, and a small Asian woman sitting on my right.  The friendly woman seemed to know something about what was going on, so I asked, and she said that she had heard it was a pickpocket and thought the screaming might be from the victim who wasn’t screaming in French.  She explained that this was a frequent problem on this train line, so she is always very protective of her purse.  There are groups of young girls who move together in the trains looking for victims. If they’re caught, they claim that they are underage, and they don’t carry documents, so the police let them go.  I asked why the police don’t hold them until their parents pick them up.  And she said, that it takes too much time, and the girls aren’t deterred because this is how they make their living.  She works in a store, she said, and deals with this problem all the time.  I thanked her and thought– the police simply haven’t devoted the resources or the will to solving the problem.  The small woman to my left, told me that this never happens in Japan.  In Japan she explained, you can leave your wallet somewhere and it will be returned to you, or will be left untouched.  The punishment for stealing is severe, so no one steals.  I asked her if she was Japanese; Cambodian she said.  Later someone else explained that the pickpockets are gypsies.  They are most frequently on the #1 line, which runs through central Paris, looking for tourists. 

I got off the metro one stop early to do some shopping.  The butcher and traiteur were both closed for school holidays, so I walked a bit further on the rue Lecourbe, looking for other stores, but many were closed, and I decided to simply make a large salad for guests in the evening.  But I did stop at a local branch of the famous patisserie, Le Nôtre,  where for 7 or 8 euros each, I bought a mille-feuilles, an éclair, and a flan.  The salesman was solicitous and the pastries and packaging gorgeous.  When I served them that evening, I put them on a plate in the kitchen and removed the identifying labels on each piece.  A guest asked if I had bought them at local pastry shop; I nodded.  We each tasted all three of them; they were rich but heavy, a disappointment, and a lesson against attraction to the obvious. 

February 26, la nouvelle Athènes

On Friday afternoon, I again met Anne at the Musée Gustave Moreau, the romantic painter of mythical and religious subjects.  Her sister-in-law Claude who paints, admires the skill of his art, but for me the mythical and religious themes were less penetrating than some of the impressionist landscapes.  (The exception was a copy of Botticelli’s Venus on an a colorful abstract canvas.)  The museum is in Moreau’s 19th century  house, with originally furnished rooms on the second floor, and two, tall, windowed, atelier floors, added by Moreau to display his work.

Musée Gustave Moreau

Anne then guided me through Moreau’s 19th century neighborhood, the 9th arrondissement quarter known as la nouvelle Athènes, after the writers and artists who lived there.  Also new to me were the wonderful houses on the rue de la Tour des Dames and the early-19th century courtyard buildings around the Square Orléans.  I was attracted to many, plain, shuttered facades and small shops, to impressions of intimacy and removal, and then to the opening and grandeur of the nevertheless fairly small Place St. Georges.

February 27

Yesterday, after my German lesson, I hopped on the metro to have lunch with F and C in Neuilly-sur-Seine.  The #6 line rides partly on elevated tracks and stations, above the roadway and through the 15th arrondissement.  The glorious part of the ride is crossing the Seine, looking  directly at the Eiffel Tower, but I also enjoy the elevated stop at Passy, which offers a quick glimpse of the discreet Square d’Alboni behind it, where I have friends. 

At the Etoile station, I changed to the #1 line in the direction of La Défense, and exited the train at Les Sablons.  I am very familiar with the walk north from the station, on the rue Louis Philippe, and on the way back, I noticed again the plain façade of the street’s remaining 19th century house.  The street tends to be shadowed, with a fair amount of traffic; nevertheless this house speaks to a lost dream or fantasy.  I peeked through the windows as always, from across the street, and then noticed for the first time an adjacent wall and gate.   Among taller, and more recent buildings around it, this house has a private side garden and a garden façade, longer and grander than the one facing the street.

house and garden on the rue Louis Philippe

I have written previously about F and C’s apartment on the rue Perronet which pre-dates World War I, as does my own apartment in New York, but theirs is more ornate and refined.  Lunch was served in the dining room, under ornate plaster ceilings, facing a row of French doors and an ornate wrought-iron balcony.  It was an avocado and grapefruit salad, a small roast beef with a sauce, roasted sliced potatoes, and baked apples with cream and caramel sauce.  I cannot cook with the same delicacy and taste as does C, nor with the same plates and elegant service.

Medical care

Americans generally believe that our medical care is the best in the world, at least for those who have good insurance.  But my personal experience questions this assumption.

In France, patients choose their doctors and hospitals.  Their basic medical care is reimbursed by the public system, but they often carry supplementary insurance, as do many Medicare beneficiaries in the United States.  While in Paris, in February, I saw two specialists, a cardiologist in private practice, and a urologist/surgeon in a private clinic.  I was pleasantly surprised.  Both spent a lot of time with me, asking and answering questions.  Both did their own testing, including an EKG, and a neck artery scan.  Both discussed and handled their own billing, like most professionals, but unlike doctors in America.  I have scheduled a surgical procedure with the urologist.  He answers his e-mails.  There was an appointment with the anesthesiologist, including a conversation, a review of my meds, and a physical exam.  In New York, it is hard to reach these people directly.  Most of the tests are delegated to technicians; the consultations are abbreviated. 

Since I am not in the French medical system, I am paying for my care, out of pocket.  Visits with specialists were typically 90 euros. 

March 25, 2023, St. Jean de Dieu

I am sitting at an open window at a small hospital or clinic, St. Jean de Dieu in Paris, looking through French windows at a 19th century courtyard, a large, bare tree and over one, in Latin, “Salus Infirmorum Ora Pro Nobis”,  Salvation for the Sick, Pray for Us. 

I’m here for prostate surgery, an old man’s procedure.  It’s not cancer, but it was discomfort, until C suggested that I deal with it. 

“Tu pisses trop souvent, Larry.  Vas voir le médecin.

And so I did. 

photo from my hospital room at St. Jean de Dieu

This photo is from my private room which cost 210 euros per day.  The whole  procedure and related lab and doctors’ appointments will likely cost 7,000 to 8,000 euros,  probably much less than in the United States, although I am not yet sure of how much Medicare will reimburse. 

The doctors and staff are efficient and friendly.  My surgeon is a friend of old friends and speaks very good medical English, which was very helpful to me in this context. Otherwise this is a French speaking institution, part of a network of hospitals and clinics owned by a Catholic healing order, founded in Spain in the 16th century. 

Everyone here is careful and meticulous.  Some of the nurses and orderlies are bossy, but it hasn’t been difficult to comply or simply ask someone else.  The food, excepting the bread, is not up to French standards, but that is not why I am here. 

March 25

I am back in an apartment in Neuilly-sur-Seine, after a second release from the clinic, due to a complication following surgery.  It was painful, but I was taken care of.  The surgeon guided me, showed up, took care of me, and calmed me with his sympathy and clarity. The nurses took charge and moved me through some difficult procedures—thank you S!  From Neuilly, F had rushed me to the clinic, on an emergency basis,  and now F and C are keeping an eye on me.  I was a difficult and frightened patient, and now a lucky one, who learned that my fear was worse than the pain, and that pain was more tolerable than I realized. 

Breakfast at the clinic, Tuesday morning, was coffee, bread, butter and jam, with orange juice. It felt like the best breakfast I had ever had.  It was normal and intense, and I am grateful.

March 2023, The Protests in France

I am no expert on the finances of the French social security system, but like our own budget, it is threatened by a growing number of longer-living retirees and a slowing number of earners/contributors.  My reading indicates that the present deficit is projected to balloon in the coming decade and that benefits, while less than in the US in absolute terms, are more generous as a percentage of pre-retirement income. 

protests in the 15th, Avenue Pasteur, January 31

The present reform will increase the retirement age from 62 to 64 and has been approved by the French president without the National Assembly’s approval, in accordance with a provision in the constitution of the 5th Republic.  However, it is still subject to the approval of the Conseil Constitutionnel (later granted).

uncollected trash, Square Trousseau, Paris 11, March 2023

Both the implementation and the intense negative reaction have been somewhat theatrical, the president’s clear but insistent and top-down attitude a holdover from the ancien régime.  The proud and insistent reaction of the unions, the demonstrators and extremist elements, is in the tradition of old revolutionary France, this with a colorful complement of burning and uncollected trash, Molotov cocktails and cobblestones.  Strikes are on pre-scheduled days, a kind of contained chaos.  Symbols of capitalism, that is international chain restaurants, an interesting choice, have been vandalized, and there have been injuries, of both protestors and the police, some serious. 

burned trash, Paris 11, March 2023

April 20, 2023 Neuilly-sur-Seine

Recuperating from surgery takes time, more so at 69 than when I was younger, but I was well cared for by my old friends, F and C who invited me to both lunch and dinner daily. No one could have been more supportive or attentive, while leaving me plenty of space to be alone. This couple is like a well oiled machine, looking after the needs of children and grandchildren, art classes, volunteer work, house maintenance, and cooking for frequent dinner guests. Their son and daughter-in-law pitched in, housing me for a week prior to the surgery in their apartment on the rue d’Aligre, after my early arrival for tests.

In the weeks following the hospitalization, I limited my movements to short walks in Neuilly, where I was staying, and later to some errands in central Paris. On one of my walks, I ran into a friend who was coming out of her front door; she and her husband invited me for coffee and a visit of their apartment and its superb garden. He reads history, including the 17th and 18th century journals of the Duc de St. Simon, which I found and downloaded on Kindle for $4 or $5. Another afternoon, I walked to the American Hospital, which caters to foreigners and the affluent. A friend had ankle surgery there a few years ago and described the food as superb.  So I was expecting a grand establishment.  Not at all.  The hospital is large but the buildings are low key and modernist. 

On another Sunday, a young friend visited, whom I knew when she and her boyfriend (now husband) were living in New York. I made her a salad and a pizza, frozen and heated in the oven, from Picard. She is now mother to a six-month old, a role that she has taken-on with calm, efficient love. She brought her baby with her, in a stroller, on the metro, and we chatted about parenting, careers, moving to Marseille, her parents, my medical issues and my writing.

Neuilly-sur-Seine was an early suburb, developed in the 19th century, with large, private villas.  Now it is better described as a small town or city, at the edge of Paris, with its own city government. It is mostly five and six story apartment houses, now far outnumbering the remaining single family houses. There is a lot of planting and well-maintained municipal  flower beds and trees, with in addition, private gardens surrounded by 19th century fences and walls. 

Neuilly also has dense mixed-use commercial streets, nearer to the subway line and the very wide and trafficked Avenue Charles de Gaulle, which links Paris with highways and the modern office district at La Défense.  Three times weekly, there is an open air market along the Avenue at Les Sablons.   One day, C and I went to pick up a roast chicken, a head of lettuce, cheeses and salmon. 

my friends’ église St. Pierre, Neuilly-sur-Seine

Mostly I shopped a few steps from the apartment, at the intersection of the rue Perronet and the rue de Chézy.  There are a butcher, green grocer, café, bank, grocer, bakery and a traiteur.  F and C are only a few doors away. I have lived here with them or visited for fifty years, and so in some sense I am at home.

shops at the intersection of the rues de Chézy and Perronet

Posted in Commentary, Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Znojmo, Czechia

main entrance, H. Weinberger house, Znojmo

Yesterday I returned to Vienna by train from Znojmo, in the Czech Republic.  Znojmo was the terminus of my trip,  suggesting old links with Austria; however, the train was almost empty when it reached the town on Tuesday morning, and there were relatively few passengers at the beginning of my return.  The train is much more crowded as it nears or leaves Vienna. Otherwise it makes a number of stops at smaller country-side stations, on a trip of about an hour and three quarters. 

Znojmo, from the train

I am living some months this year in Vienna, to better understand my past and its present.  Under new legislation (much delayed), the Austrian government gave us citizenship in September 2020, and a city of limited interest (to me), became intriguing.  My mother was born in Vienna in 1928 and escaped to the United States in 1939. 

My visit to Znojmo was suggested and organized by a cousin, Lilian W. S., also born in Vienna, in 1933, and whose family lived in Znojmo before escaping to Switzerland at the end of 1938 and to United States in 1941. Lilian then grew up in New York  and married a cousin of my father.  But she has kept contact with her home town.  She reached out to a friend and asked him to organize a visit to her family’s former house, and to her maternal family’s factory. 

Lilian W. S. in the Hudson River Valley
photo by Eve

Znojmo is in Moravia, and Moravia and Bohemia were governed by the Austrian Hapsburgs, from the 16th century until 1918.  The population was a mixture of Czechs and Austrian Germans, although the border areas were more heavily German, the eventual basis for Nazi claims.  Znojmo (Znaim in German) is in this border area, then known as the Sudetenland, and annexed by Germany following the infamous Munich agreement of September 1938.   At the end of the Second World War, the German population was pushed out.  

Jews also lived in Znojmo beginning in at least the 14th century.  The community was probably the largest in Moravia in the early 1400’s, but was then expelled in 1454 and not permitted to return until 1851.  (In Vienna, we were expelled in 1670, but there were exceptions.  Austrian emancipation was granted following the Revolution of 1848.)  An impressive Moorish revival synagogue was built in Znojmo in 1878.  It burned on Kristallnacht, in November 1938, and was eventually torn down.

Lilian’s family, Weinbergers on her father’s side and Lichtensterns on her mother’s, were successful industrialists.  Her paternal grandfather, Alfred Weinberger (1860-1955) was born near Brno and owned a leather tannery in Znojmo.  Her maternal grandfather, Oskar Lichtenstern, was born in Vienna in 1878 and moved to Znojmo following the Lichtenstern family purchase of the existing Rudolf Ditmar ceramics factory in 1912.  The Lichtensterns later added a second Czech concern, creating Ditmar Urbach, to their original factory in Wilhelmsburg, west of Vienna.  They shifted to the production of sanitary ceramics and opened subsidiaries in central Europe, Switzerland, Milan and Bombay.  The businesses were expropriated by the Nazi’s in 1938 and 1939.  

Before the War, Lilian’s family was oriented to Vienna; both sides of her family had property there;  some eventually returned to Austria, but not to Czechoslovakia.  Lilian grew up speaking German, and in her occasional strict reserve, she is still, subtly, a refugee and Viennese.

Ditmar Urbach, hand painted bowl
courtesy Lilian W. S.

Ditmar Urbach bathroom fixtures, late 1920’s, posted on 1st Dibs.

Beyond the outskirts of Vienna, the train rode through a relatively flat landscape, but it undulates a bit, and the fields are very beautiful.  As we crossed the Czech border, a new conductor scanned my ticket for a second time. Approaching Znojmo there is more forest, and the landscape is more mountainous, although the elevations are modest.  The town is on a rise, overlooking the Dyje River.  

train station Znojmo

Lilian’s friend, David G., met me at the station. We walked into town, past the outer Ring (in the Viennese style), past the greenbelt that replaced the city’s fortifications, past a late-19th century apartment house that had belonged to his grandparents, and into the old town center, organized around two public squares.  Znojmo is not large, at about 33,000 residents, but it is concentrated, with an attractive and well-maintained historic core, a mixture of medieval, baroque and 19th century buildings, some courageously modernist 1930’s structures, and some very nice cafés. My hotel was small, some steps down from a medieval/baroque church, and from my room there was a view over the town’s outer districts, to the river, reservoir, and forested mountains.  The weather was cool and the leaves were changing color. 

Upper Square, Znojmo, and the 1930’s Bata Service Centre
Bata was a client of the Weinberger concern
the Wolf Tower, from the old city walls
The sculpture memorializes old phone booths. 19th century theater in the background
Upper Square in the 1920’s with the synagogue

David showed me around, and we had lunch before a 2:00 PM appointment at Lilian’s childhood house at 19 Rudoleckého Street.  In the 1920’s three houses were built for Alfred Weinberger and his two sons, Hans and Fritz. They were side-by-side, in a newer neighborhood, outside the former city walls. In the years after World War I, Rudoleckého Street was known as Wilson Street.

Lilian’s house, that is her father Hans’ house, was designed by the Jewish/Czech architect Norbert Troller, with the interiors done by a Viennese architect and designer, Armand Weiser.  The houses are still standing, but only the Hans Weinberger house is accessible; it is a nursery school. 

Hans Weinberger house, front facade

The staff member who met us had copies of interior photographs from a 1928 article in Innen-Dekoration, a German design magazine published in Darmstadt. She helpfully matched the rooms to the photographs as she showed us the house.  Here is the link to the full article:  https://digi.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/diglit/innendekoration1928/0435/image,info

The interior is largely intact, not so much upstairs, but on the main floor, where the entrance and main public rooms have been well preserved.  The house blends clean-lined early 20th century modernism with more traditionally grounded arts-and-crafts elements.  Its relatively small main entrance, on the side of the house, contrasts with a large cloak room and an enormous paneled “living hall”, still complete with built-in benches and a fireplace. 

A formal French salon, with original fabric panels, is also at the front of the house, and it opens to a mahogany paneled dining room, kitchen areas and a gentleman’s room at the rear.  Large paned windows face an enormous walled garden, now a worn play area, that must have given a beautiful view when it was fully planted. 

Hans Weinberger house, living hall, as published in Innen-Dekoration, 1928

salon, as published in Innen-Dekoration, 1928
bedroom, as published in Innen-Dekoration, 1928

The house is large, not huge; a breakfast room and a stove were at one time located adjacent to the bedrooms upstairs.  The taste was sophisticated and up-to-date, reflecting the preferences of many affluent Jewish families. The simplicity of the house’s outer form and its clean lines are forward looking. The richly detailed arts-and-craft interiors are more traditional, but through the lens of late 19th and early 20th century design. 

dining room, H. Weinberger house
rear view of the H. Weinberger house from the garden; Alfred Weinberger house to the left
The garden as it was, shared by all three houses.
Alfred Weinberger in the garden with his grandchildren at one of many family gatherings: Lilian (front center), her sister Anita (front left), cousin Georg (front right), cousin Herbert Low (rear), older girl unknown

This is a comfortable place, almost understated; it is not modestly middle class, and it does not mimic the aristocratic.  The house certainly depended on some level of staffing to operate. The school is evidently proud of the house; its interiors were protected by a former director; the local preservation office came in to give advice; and the woodwork is cleaned and treated once a year; clearly the memory of the house has some importance. Note the front windows, shaped like the tablets of the law, or like the round-arched windows on Moorish Revival synagogues; this subtle reference likely belongs to Norbert Troller.   

The Weinberger tannery no longer exists, but following the visit to the house, we crossed the railroad tracks and visited a large factory complex that was formerly owned by the Lilian’s maternal family, the Lichtensterns. The old buildings are still there; although they have been extensively remodeled.  And the factory still makes sanitary ceramics, toilets, sinks and shower basins, under the company name Laufen, which I see everywhere in Austria, now owned by the Barcelona-based Roca group.  The Lichtenstern grandparents’ house was on the factory grounds, apparently with a well-tended garden.  It is visible on an old print which hangs on the general manager’s office wall, but it no longer exists.    

front view of the Laufen factory complex, Znojmo

earthenware molds, Laufen factory, Znojmo
Oskar and Ema Lichtenstern, Lilian’s maternal grandparents, upstate New York

At the factory, I was welcomed to an interesting visit and short-course on sanitary ceramics production, by the smart, energetic general manager, Gabriel Mašek.  The earthenware is produced in molds that have a limited life span; the glaze is sprayed-on by hand, although there is also robotics equipment.   Earthenware is a natural material, occasionally inconsistent even under controlled conditions.  So there is a small loss factor, as not all of the imperfections can be repaired.  The Znojmo factory is not the largest in the group, but it produces some of the most specialized work.  This is an old place, still forward looking and modern.

At the end of the day, David invited me to an unusual wine bar, with about 85 wines, in an old brewery, not far from my hotel.  Tasting is automated. He chose wines from a printed menu, locating each in refrigerator cases by number.  We then selected tasting, half glass or full glass portions, and tried a number of them, with a plate of sausage and cheese.

wine tasting room, Znojmo

refrigerated display and dispensers

Phylloxera, two world wars, and communism were hard on this old Moravian wine region, although production had become increasingly sophisticated in the late 19th century.  Since the fall of communism in 1989, there has again been an increase in education and new vineyards.  I am not an expert, but at least two of the 6-7 wines I tasted were extremely good.  Here is an article on Moravian wine production that is posted on-line:  https://www.europenowjournal.org/2020/11/09/bottle-revolution-the-emerging-importance-of-the-wine-industry-in-south-moravia/

On the second day of my visit, David drove me to the Jewish cemetery a few minutes out of town—that is the “new” one that was founded in the 19th century.  The medieval cemetery in town has mostly disappeared.  The new cemetery is owned by the Brno Jewish community, as there is no longer a Jewish community in Znojmo.  Most of the older stones are missing—sold during the communist era; they may now be paving stones in Prague and other cities. 

David G. with his father

David G. met Lilian at the cemetery in 2001 and then at a luncheon given for her a few years later, an event honoring the placement of brass stumbling stones or Stolpersteine, for her young cousin (pictured above with his grandfather) and an aunt who lived in the Weinberger house next door and disappeared during the War. 

Stolpersteine for cousin Georg and his mother Irena Weinberger, in German and Czech, “Here lived Georg Alexander Weinberger, Irena Weinberger, fled in 1942 before arrest and deportation; Slovakia, Hungary,
fate unknown”

David’s family, like Lilian’s, got out, just before the outbreak of the War, but returned to Znojmo, where he now lives with his wife and two children. His family was also very accomplished. His great-grandfather, a physician, moved to Znojmo from Bohemia and purchased the 19th century house he had shown me on the town’s outer Ring.  His grandfather was also a doctor, largely serving the Czech community; his father and his mother were physicians.  The family assimilated; neither David’s mother nor his wife are Jewish, but his father, grandparents and great-grandparents were, and they are buried in this cemetery. 

David and his family now live in the family house, the fourth generation, but as far has he knows, he is now the only self-identified Jew in the town. 

October 2022

vineyard, outside Znojmo
Posted in Commentary, Uncategorized | 11 Comments

Trieste

Last week, I took the train south from Klagenfurt (in south Austria) to Trieste.  Reviewing Google maps, I had assumed that the train headed directly south through Slovenia.  But history or geography planned a route that skirts Slovenia completely.  The first train, running long distance to Venice,  entered Italy at approximately Tarvisio.  I changed to a local train in Udine that runs southeast to Gorizia, at the Slovenian border, before turning directly south, to the narrow spit of Italian coastal territory along the Adriatic that includes Trieste. 

My sister asks if our parents brought us to Trieste in the 1960’s, but I do not remember it, and if she is right, we likely drove through it, on our way to Opatija on the Yugoslav coast.   My present interest in Trieste comes from its relatively low profile.  It is a port, a coffee port, polyglot, with a mixture of Italians and Slovenes and other Balkans.  In this region Venice is the big draw for Americans, or sometimes the Croatian coast.  Unlike the Austrians who ruled it for centuries, we don’t know much about it, and despite many trips to Europe, I too knew nothing.   

And so my visit and observation has been in small increments, focusing on what I see and quickly reference on the internet, and now more broadly on my reading.  For this, I read an interesting and informative memoir by the Welsh writer, Jan Morris, Trieste and the Meaning of Nowhere, published in 2001. 

My arrival in Trieste was at the main train station, where I walked through a modern addition with an impeccable marble and stainless steel bathroom, and then through an impressive, tall,  waiting room from the Austrian period.  I walked further, all the way to my hotel,  in order to see the city.  This was difficult, because of my heavy suitcase and the heat, but more so because the first streets were shabby and the handsome buildings ill-kept.  But then the walk took me to the impressive Canale Grande, an old docking port that was built into the center of town, and then just a few blocks further to my small hotel.    

the train station

What is it about Trieste that gives it an air of old time romance?  Its buildings are not among the most historic in Europe,  nor has it been a political capital, although it does have a Roman forum and amphitheatre.  

the Canale Grande and the church, Sant’Antonio Nuovo
a bank building on a square facing the canal

Instead it is the 19th century that dominates Trieste, its past more bourgeois than aristocratic, and that may be the source of its intrigue.  19th century Trieste,  that is Austrian Trieste–a port city, with its 4-6 story buildings and original, intact, facades–has been almost entirely preserved.  They are colorful and classical, modestly grand, with style and ornament that reference ancient Rome, or Vienna,  or occasionally Venice.  And the buildings, while not old by European standards, feel old, a bit frozen in time, still useable without having ceded to the present.  Collectively they say that Trieste is an active city, but that formerly it was a grand one.  Indeed its relative importance, as the main port for the Austrian Empire, declined after it was ceded to Italy at the end of the First World War.  And yet, Trieste is an active place, a commercial port, and a gateway city to the Balkans. 

Piazza della Borsa
Illy Café. Illy is headquartered in Trieste.

Piazza dell’Unita d’Italia

an ordinary café, but on the Piazza

My hotel, Residenza le 6A, is in an old apartment building.  It is really a pensione with just six rented rooms and a few short term rental units, on a stone-paved pedestrian street that terminates with a shopping street at one end and a white marble side of the classical church Sant’Antonio Nuovo, at the other.  In the pavement, in front of the large double entrance door, are four brass plaques, or “stumbling stones” for members of the Goldschmied family who were deported from here in the early 1940’s.  I was struck how this history had followed me from Vienna, where a few months ago, I stood at the doorway through which my grandmother’s older sister had also been deported. 

via Santa Catarina, outside my hotel

the building entrance to my hotel

Behind the doors, the entry hall is mammoth, with a tiled floor, huge glass and wrought iron doors at the rear, faded switches that add a few minutes of light, and a substantial stone staircase and tiny elevator to a large entry landing with two large pedimented double-doors and more switches.  And then inside the pensione, dim, quiet, music, comfortable furniture, a breakfast area, and a reception desk, occupied in the morning by a very helpful Andrea.  My room faces over the street, also quiet, with two new sets of windows, tall ceilings, an armoire, a side chair, a built in desk, air-conditioning, and a modern bathroom.  And this is where I am writing.    

On my second full day here, I took a public bus (6 or 36, across from the main train station)  to Castello Miramare,  perhaps the most visited site in Trieste.  Like the city, it was built in the mid-19th century by Maximilian, a younger brother of the Austrian emperor, who was briefly the emperor of Mexico before his execution by “rebels”.  It is pure gothic revival on the outside, more like an important English country house than a castle.  Inside it is opulent and eclectic reflecting both its time and its attachment to the further past.  It is grand, with an enfilade of gorgeous but not terribly private rooms, endless portraits of kings and Hapsburg family members and ancestors; there is even a grand bed of state—all a reminder of the authority and importance of the owner.  The placement of the house at the edge of the Adriatic, the marble walk around it, the terraced garden, the bathing steps into the sea; these are the real inspirations and the beauty of this place. 

Castello Miramare

Castello Miramare

Walking back to the bus, along a more plebian but living ocean front, I had lunch at a private beach club in its café overlooking the sea, then walked further along the shoreline, past sunbathers and some swimmers.   A younger man, muscled and wet from the water, climbed on a bicycle in front of me, wearing only a small bathing suit and backpack, and pedaled barefoot a bit further down the shore to a public shower.  A young woman, also shirtless and with smallish breasts,  lay back on a towel along the walk.  Everyone seemed at ease, their movement effortless and un-self-conscious. 

On my way to the bus station, I had seen a small pastry and chocolate shop.  So I stopped at  Bomboniera on the way back to the hotel.  The shop dates to the early 19th century, ornate, and high-ceilinged, with tall, carved display cases and a crystal chandelier.  My strudel was a rolled nut cake with apricot jam, served on a “silver” tray with the coffee and a small glass of hot chocolate.  The cake was better than what I find at most of the shops in Vienna.  There are a few indoor seats, and then outside, tables in the middle of the pedestrian street.  I saw this everywhere—pedestrian streets centered by café and restaurant tables.  Frequently these places are busy, and while there are many visitors, most of the patrons sound local.

Bomboniera
Bomboniera

The hills in Trieste are older and quieter than the commercial city.   The original city, the forum, the Roman amphitheater, the old city walls and the city’s cathedral are on a hill.   So too are many 19th century buildings, and more meandering and some narrower streets, a contrast to the rational grid below, and some small café’s and restaurants.   Also high up are some modern buildings, often depressing due to their lesser quality and maintenance, and some old 19th century mansions, indicating perhaps that portions of these hills were formerly bucolic and more desirable.  As it is they are residential, quieter, and greener, with some flights of steps and small parks. 

a hillside park in bloom
hillside mansion, behind its garden and an iron gate
hillside apartments with shutters

What may be the grandest mansion in Trieste is in a 19th century enclave near the port.  Now the Museo Revoltella (Via Armando Diaz 27), the house was built for Pasquale Revoltella, a self-made importer, investor, and a significant backer of the construction of the Suez Canal.  He was enobled by the Austrian emperor and left his wealth and the house to the city. The house, designed by a German-Jewish-to-Lutheran architect, George Hitzig, was converted into a museum in 1872,   with its art collection and furniture intact.  It is opulent, huge in scale, even larger due to its combination with an adjacent house.  The permanent art collection and the furniture are impressive but arguably not extremely significant.  However, the temporary exhibition was extraordinary, a collection of Impressionist paintings of Normandy, including two Monets.  (Here is the link, https://museorevoltella.it/monet-e-gli-impressionisti-in-normandia/ ).  I am rarely able to look at art of this quality without looking past or through other people.  Here I was almost alone in the exhibition rooms and in the main house, a rare pleasure while traveling.   

19th century enfilade, Museo Revoltella

There were even fewer visitors at the Museum of Antiquity, J.J. Winckelmann (via della Cattredrale, 15) , named after a well-known German art historian and archeologist, who was murdered in Trieste in 1768, likely in a fit of anti-homosexual rage.  The museum is also in a 19th century house. It and its institutional improvements are gently aging, but it has a large walled garden,  sprinkled with antiquities,  and inside,  an excellent and accessible collection of ancient stone heads, busts and pottery.   In the garden, and on the steps leading up the hill to the Cathedral, is a small temple, with inside, a monument to the archeologist.

Museum of Antiquity

Museum of Antiquity

I have eaten in various restaurants and cafés in Trieste, and generally, the food is more Italian than Viennese, and it is good.  Eataly has a very attractive building on the port, much less crowded than the one in New York, and its restaurant has a gorgeous view, but it was closed for dinner when I went.  Instead, anticipating a splurge, I stopped at Harry’s, which sits prominently on the Piazza dell’Unita d’Italia, linked with the five star Grand Hotel Duchi D’Aosta.  I typically avoid places like this, but I was in a mood, and I’m writing, so I stopped first for a local white wine served with chips, nuts and olives and then moved across the terrace for a second glass of wine, pasta, and coffee.  The service was friendly and elegant.  Some, not all of the patrons, were very privileged Americans.  The pasta was filling and very good; the bill was 40 euros. 

view over vegetables to an Eataly restaurant
Piazza dell’Unita d’Italia from Harry’s bar

On the morning before I left Trieste, I visited the Museum of the Jewish Community of Trieste at via del Monte 5/7, just a few blocks from my hotel. The museum is in a building that it shares with apartments (like my hotel), but it was formerly a Jewish hospital and later a refugee center and way-station for Jews fleeing central Europe for Palestine, the United States, or elsewhere.  During the 1930’s the Jewish community helped others fleeing the Nazis, unaware that its members would also, eventually, need to be saved.

I was the only visitor, as the main synagogue is the more frequent draw, and learned that the Jewish community in Trieste now numbers only about 300 in a regional Jewish population of about 500.  This small group is much reduced from its pre-World War II numbers (about 6,000 in 1938 per Wikipedia),  but it nevertheless maintains a cemetery, the museum and a large neo-Moorish synagogue that was opened in 1912.  The detailed and extensive exhibition focuses on the history of the community and its cultural contribution.   Afterwards, I downloaded and am now reading  Zeno’s Conscience by Italo Svevo.  I was told that he is required reading in Italian literature classes, although his fame was initially due to the support of James Joyce and French literary circles. 

It has been very hot in Trieste the past couple of days.  It is a late June afternoon, at 5 o’clock, at 91 degrees Fahrenheit (32.8 degrees Celsius), and I am hiding in my hotel room.  I have seen enough on this trip and need to write down my admiration for this city’s manageable scale and frequent beauty. Next time, I’ll combine a visit with a ferry to the Croatian coast. Tomorrow, I am on nine-hour train back to Vienna.  The first class ticket was for a small premium—well worth it for a long, but hopefully relaxing trip. 

Trieste, June 27, 2022

Posted in Commentary, Uncategorized | 3 Comments